Int J Biol Sci 2012; 8(3):418-429. doi:10.7150/ijbs.3676 This issue Cite

Research Paper

Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas

Chun Ming Wang1, Peng Liu1, Fei Sun1, Lei Li1, Peng Liu1, Jian Ye2, Gen Hua Yue1 Corresponding address

1. Molecular Population Genetics Group, Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, 117604 Singapore;
2. Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, 117604 Singapore.

Wang CM, Liu P, Sun F, Li L, Liu P, Ye J, Yue GH. Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas. Int J Biol Sci 2012; 8(3):418-429. doi:10.7150/ijbs.3676.
Other styles

File import instruction


MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that play crucial regulatory roles by targeting mRNAs for silencing. To identify miRNAs in Jatropha curcas L, a bioenergy crop, cDNA clones from two small RNA libraries of leaves and seeds were sequenced and analyzed using bioinformatic tools. Fifty-two putative miRNAs were found from the two libraries, among them six were identical to known miRNAs and 46 were novel. Differential expression patterns of 15 miRNAs in root, stem, leave, fruit and seed were detected using quantitative real-time PCR. Ten miRNAs were highly expressed in fruit or seed, implying that they may be involved in seed development or fatty acids synthesis in seed. Moreover, 28 targets of the isolated miRNAs were predicted from a jatropha cDNA library database. The miRNA target genes were predicted to encode a broad range of proteins. Sixteen targets had clear BLASTX hits to the Uniprot database and were associated with genes belonging to the three major gene ontology categories of biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. Four targets were identified for JcumiR004. By silencing JcumiR004 primary miRNA, expressions of the four target genes were up-regulated and oil composition were modulated significantly, indicating diverse functions of JcumiR004.

Keywords: Jatropha, Biofuel, miRNA, fatty acid synthesis.


There are several classes of 19-24 nt short RNAs that regulate gene expression. The most conserved class is the microRNAs (miRNAs), which are small, noncoding RNAs that can play crucial regulatory roles in eukaryotes by targeting mRNAs for silencing [1]. Many miRNAs are conserved between species, others are only conserved between more closely related species such as C. elegans and C. briggsae [2, 3]. So far, identification of miRNAs has been limited to a few model species with their genomes sequenced. The main approach to discover miRNAs and their targets in plants is based on prediction programs that scan genomic or cDNA sequence [4]. The weakness of this approach resides in the use of genome sequence or cDNA sequence, the substantial effort and time spent trying to validate false in silico candidates before a real target is identified. Studies were undertaken to identify miRNAs that are difficult to predict in silico or not conserved in model plants. Such studies have been hampered, however, by the lack of sensitive cloning methods for miRNAs. Because the available computational approaches can only identify miRNAs that are conserved, a cloning approach was employed to identify non model plants' miRNAs that may not be conserved or may have atypical features [5].

Jatropha curcas L is a perennial poisonous shrub belonging to the Euphorbiaceae family [6]. Its seeds contain about 30% oil that is usable in a standard diesel engine [7], therefore jatropha is regarded as a promising candidate for producing biodiesel and becoming one of the world's key energy crops [8, 9]. We found that the variation in DNA level within Jatropha curcas was very limited despite of large phenotypic variation [10], and we conducted marker-traits analysis by using interspecies crossing populations between Jatropha curcas and Jatropha integerrima [11]. Herein we are searching for epigenetic factors including miRNAs in jatropha, which could be an important contributor to the large phenotypic variations within Jatropha curcas. However, it is generally difficult to identify miRNAs in non model plant species due to its poor genome information.

As for predicting miRNA targets, of the predicted targets of the first 14 Arabidopsis miRNA families, 70% are transcription factor genes [12]. As more nonconserved miRNAs are being identified, the diversity of target genes expands beyond the dominating transcription factor genes to include classes associated with other metabolic and cellular processes [13]. miRNA networks may also modulate species specific processes such as wood formation in trees [14]. To gain an understanding of these jatropha-specific processes that likely require the regulation of many genes, we endeavor to investigate the miRNA networks in leaf and seed tissues of jatropha, which is a promising key energy crop in the near future.

The identification of miRNA targets is essential for understanding miRNA functions. Identification of miRNAs and their targets is challenging, which was often done computationally. The main criterion for target prediction is the sequence complementarities between a miRNA and its target genes. Even though computational target prediction has been successful, but false positive rates exist [15]. Therefore, experimental validation must be performed. The biological significance of silencing miRNAs was described previously [16], briefly, the action on anti-miRNA oligonucleotides is to silence miRNAs but to upregulate gene expression by relieving the repressive effect of miRNAs on their target protein-coding genes. In some cases, upregulation of gene expression is desirable. Anti-miRNA oligonucleotides were proved to be useful in inhibiting individual miRNAs, thereby helping to unravel the function of miRNAs and their targets in human [17] and mice [18]. An experimental approach to target identification was presented where the cartilage-specific miR-140 was silenced in mouse cells. The mRNAs derepressed by silencing of miR-140 was identified [19]. Significantly reduced accumulation of miR163 and miR171a was achieved using hairpin RNAi constructs that were designed to target both the primary miRNA transcripts. Reduction of miRNA accumulation resulted in an increase in accumulation of the mRNA targets of these miRNAs [20]. In this study, we validated the putative targets predicted based on complementarities through examining their expression variation by directly silencing the corresponding primary miRNA through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). VIGS offers an attractive alternative as it allows the investigation of gene functions without plant transformation. For plants with long life cycle such as jatropha, however, transgenic technology is unsuitable for routine testing of gene function because it is time consuming and laborious [21].

In this study, we isolated a collection of miRNAs and their target genes in jatropha, and examined the expression patterns of miRNAs in different tissues. We further analyzed the functions of JcumiR004, as an example of the miRNA directly isolated from jatropha, and showed JcumiR004 may play important roles in a broad range of biological functions related to agronomic traits including oil composition.


Cloning and identification of miRNAs in jatropha

In order to identify miRNAs in jatropha, we generated two small RNA libraries ranging in size from 18-26 nt using RNA isolated from leaves and developing seeds. The isolated small RNAs were separated by 15% denaturing PAGE and small RNAs of 19-26 nt were gel-purified, ligated with 3' and 5'-adaptors and RT-PCR-amplified as described [22]. PCR products were isolated by electrophoresis, cloned into the pGEMT vector and sequenced. A total of 426 and 356 sequences were collected from leaf and seed libraries respectively. Analysis of these sequences resulted in identification of 233 and 114 unique sequences ranging in size from 19-26 nt in length, which is of the typical size range for endogenous small RNAs. The number of small RNA of 23 nt was highest compare to those of other size (Fig. 1).

One important feature of miRNAs is the hairpin stem-looped structure in the precursors[23]. The RNA sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis against the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Euphorbia genistoides and Jatropha curcas. From these plants, 52 sequences were screened which harboring putative miRNAs from jatropha leaf or seed library (Table 1), and four of which were found both in the leaf and seed small RNA libraries, i.e. JcumiR001, JcumiR002, JcumiR005 and JcumiR022 (Table 1). These sequences were capable of forming stem-loop structures characteristic of miRNA precursors (Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1). Among these putative miRNAs, six were homologous to known miRNAs, JcumiR012-osa mir166e; JcumiR015-Rattus norvegicus mir-3596a; JcumiR017-Osa MIR457 precursor; JcumiR018-Osa microRNA 169c gene; JcumiRNA027-Osa microRNA 167d gene; JcumiRNA042-Capsella rubella miR319a; while the other 46 were novel.

 Figure 1 

Size of distribution of 882 small RNAs in Jatropha curcas L.

Int J Biol Sci Image
 Table 1 

miRNAs isolated from jatropha.

miRNASequenceLengthsmall RNA library
of clones
Precursor in other plants
GenBank Access No
ΔGknown miRNAs
in other species
JcumiR001UGUCGCGAUGGUAAUUCAACC21leaf and seed6 and 2Hevea brasiliensis DQ306824.1-23.2
JcumiR002GAUCGCGUGGCCUAAUGGA19leaf and seed26 and 2Vitis vinifera AM463399-30.4
JcumiR003UCCUCUGAGCUAGGCAAUG19leaf1Jatropha curcas EZ413062.1-31.1
JcumiR004UGAUUGAGCCGUGCCAAUAUC21leaf1Oryza sative AY551250.1-54.5
JcumiR005GUCGUUGUAGUAUAGUGGU19leaf and seed12 and 5Populus trichocarpapa AC209103-27.6
JcumiR006GGCAUGGGCGAUAUGGGCAAG21leaf2Strongylocentrotus purpuratus XM_001189429-37.8
JcumiR007AUCAAAAGGGUUGGUAUUGCUCCU24leaf1Euphorbia genistoidesAM040819-23.3
JcumiR008GAUGCUGGUGUUCGGGCUA19leaf2Medicago truncatu AC156629-18.1
JcumiR009AUUCGGCUCAAUCCUUUUAG20leaf1Jatropha curcas FJ695500.1-21.1
JcumiR010GGAAACAGAAUUGGCGGCUU20leaf1Arabidopsis thaliana AL161537-30.11
JcumiR011UGGUUCAAGGCGUAGCAUUGG21leaf3Vitis vinifera AM477478-28.57
JcumiR012GAAUGUUGUCUGGUUCAAGG20leaf1Oryza sativa HM139377.1-58.7Precursor of Osa-miR166e
JcumiR013GAAUUAUAGGUGUUGAAUAUGGU23leaf1Populus trichocarpapa AC213088-18.6
JcumiR014UGGUAGAGCGGUCGGCUGU19leaf1Phaseolusvulgari EU196765-44.1
JcumiR015UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUAUAGU21leaf2Rattus norvegicus NR_037385.1-34.2Rattus norvegicus mir-3596a
JcumiR016UCGCACACAUGUCAGACUCCCC22leaf2Mimulus guttatusAC182572-38.2
JcumiR017UCCACUGCGCUAUGCGGUC19leaf2Oryza sativa AY946832-40.05Osa mir457 precursor
JcumiR018CCGGCAAGUCAUCCUUGGCUG21leaf1Oryza sativa AY551241-69.06Osa mirRNA 169c gene
JcumiR019GGGGAUGUAGCUCAAAUGGUAGAG24leaf5Oryza sativa AK288811.1-48.7
JcumiR020UCGAAAAUUCAACGCAAGC19leaf1Oryza sativa AL607000.3-49.8
JcumiR021UUCCCGUUUCCGCCCAACUCA21leaf1Vitis vinifera AM436815-38.08
JcumiR022GGGUGCGAUCAUACCAGCAC20leaf and seed2 and 7Vitis vinifera AM48227-44.84
JcumiR023GGGGGGUCCCAGUCCCGAAC20leaf3Arachis duranensis HP035294.1-66.9
JcumiR024GGGCACGUCUGCCUGGGUGUCA22leaf4Jatropha curcas EZ408819.1-55.6
JcumiR025GGAAUAGCUCAGUUGGUAGAG21leaf1Solanum lycopersi AC215427-27.4
JcumiR026UGCUUUUAGGUAGGUUUGGUGAAC24leaf1Vitis vinifera AM444108-27.9
JcumiR027UGAAGCUGCCAGCAUGAUCUGG22leaf2Populus trichocarpa AC213492-26.2Osa mir167d gene
JcumiR028GACCGAGUGCCUCCCACGC19leaf2Jatropha curcas EZ414173.1-33.1
JcumiR029GCCGCUAUGAUGAAAUCGGU20seed1Vitis vinifera AM451225-38.12
JcumiR030ACAGACCGGUAGACUUGAAC20seed1Vitis vinifera AM45651-24.2
JcumiR031GUCCCAGUCCCGAACCCGUCGG22seed1Vitis vinifera AM456511,
Populus EST CU231567
JcumiR032UGGUGCCCGAUAGCGUGGUC20seed1Oryza sativa AP008211-18.9
JcumiR033UCCAUUAGGCUACGCGAUC19seed1Oryza sativa CT832877-19.8
JcumiR034CGAGUUCUAUCGGGUAAAGCCAA23seed1Populus trichocarpa AC216416-32.7
JcumiR035UGAGGUAGUUGUUUGUAUGG20seed8Vitis vinifera AM436351-40.6
JcumiR036UCAAAAUAUAACCUUCCCA19seed4Vitis vinifera AM454629-74.43
JcumiR037GGGUUCGUUUCCCACAGACGGCGC24seed4Vitis vinifera AM478487-25.05
JcumiR038GGGAGGAGGUGGUGGUGGGC20seed7Oryza minuta AC229917-147.25
JcumiR039UACCAUUUGAGCUAAUCCCCC21seed2Vitis vinifera AM486140-79
JcumiR040UGGAAUUCGCGGUUAAAUU20seed3Oryza sativa AK241705-19.9
JcumiR041CGGUGUGCACCUGUCGGCUCGUCCC25seed7Vitis vinifera AM423427-26.7
JcumiR042UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUGUGGUU22seed10Vitis vinifera AM463593-90.5Capsella rubella miR319a
JcumiR043UGAGGUAGUUGGUUGUAUGGU21seed5Vitis vinifera AM458795-65.22
JcumiR044UUCUGAAAUGUGCGUGUGU19seed3Vitis vinifera AM458673-60.04
JcumiR045GAGUCCGGAGACGUCGGCGGGGGC24seed7Arabidopsis thali AK230153-75.9
JcumiR046UGCUGUGAUCAGUGUCGCU19seed2Populus trichocarpa AC185361-19.4
JcumiR047UCACAGUGUCAUUUAGCUGA20seed7Oryza sativa AP008209-36.9
JcumiR048UGUGGGAUGAUGAUCUUGCG20seed10Oryza sativa AP008214-28.7
JcumiR049CGCCACACCUCCCUCGCCC19seed2Oryza sativa CR855194-30.7
JcumiR050UGCCUUAGACUAAAUUCGUGUC22seed2Vitis vinifera AM456883-17.7
JcumiR051UGGUUCCCGAUAACGCGUGGUC22seed2Arabidopsis thali NM_106553-36
JcumiR052UGAAAAGGUGUUGGUUGAUA20seed2Vitis vinifera AM483931-54.1

Expression profiling of miRNAs

Knowledge about the expression patterns of miRNAs can provide clues about their functions. To get an insight into possible tissue-dependent roles of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas, the expression patterns of miRNAs in different tissues, including root, stem, leave, fruit and seed were examined using quantitative real time PCR. Expression patterns of some miRNAs could not be well evaluated through real time PCR due to non-specific amplicons. Fifteen miRNAs, which have been well detected, revealed different expression patterns. Half of miRNAs isolated from leaf (JcumiR014, 017, 021) did not expressed in fruit or seed, while all miRNAs isolated from seed expressed abundantly in seed (Fig. 2). Besides the miRNA from seed library, JcumiR004, 008 and 018 from leaf library also showed to be highly expressed in seed. JcumiR014 and JcumiR029 were found to be strongly expressed in leaf. Expression of JcumiR002, 005 and 007 was higher in stem, but lower in other tissues tested. JcumiR004, 029, 035, 042 and 044 showed moderate expression in roots. JcumiR004, 008 and 022 from leaf library, and JcumiR029, 035, 042 and 044 from seed library showed ubiquitous expression in all tissues, although the expression of JcumiR008, 022 and 042 were relatively higher in seeds (Fig. 2). These observations suggest that these miRNAs display differential tissue-specific expression patterns.

 Figure 2 

Expressions of 15 primary JcumiRNAs in different tissues. The 18S rRNA was selected as a control. 1: root, 2: stem, 3: leaf, 4: fruit and 5: seed.

Int J Biol Sci Image

Predicted targets of jatropha miRNAs

In plants, the miRNA target sites were found predominantly in the coding regions [24]. We searched putative miRNA targets with a cDNA library constructed by Dr Yin Zhongchao's group in our institute. Twenty eight predicted target genes have target sites in the coding region (Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1). More than two targets were screened for JcumiR004, 008, 014, 021 and 036. We were unable to predict targets for half of the miRNAs by applying the above rules, due to the limited number of jatropha EST sequences available in the databases.

Gene ontology of the targets

The 28 ESTs of putative targets were used to search for similar protein sequences in the Uniprot database (BLASTX). The functional information is presented in Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1. Using the best hits found by BLASTX, an inferred gene ontology annotation was found for 16 of the sequences through QuickGO. Using GO Slimmer in AmiGO database, of the 16 known functional ESTs, one was associated with genes belonging to biological process, 7 with cellular component, and 8 with molecular function. The result showed that the miRNA target genes encoded a broad range of proteins, with majority (15/16) of the predicted protein products involved in molecular function and cellular component ontologies. The predicted protein description of the target EST sequences were listed in Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1, with some interesting proteins such as DNA cross-link repair protein, vacuolar ATP synthase proteolipid, elongation factor 1-alpha, Cytochrome c-type biogenesis protein, 14-3-3 protein, heat stress transcription factor A-5, etc. Thus, the miRNA target genes encode a broad range of proteins.

Functional classification of JcumiR004 targets

The highest number of ESTs were found to be putative targets of JcumiR004 in the jatropha cDNA library, which are homologues to four genes or mRNA in Arabidopsis, i.e. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E22 (UBC22), Protein BUD31 homolog 1(Os01g0857700), Proteasome subunit alpha type-3 (PAG1), Auxin response factor 7 (ARF7). These genes play important roles in a broad range of biological functions. The products of UBC22 and ARF7 were classified into molecular function ontology, involved in the elemental activities of a gene product at the molecular level, such as binding or catalysis; while Os01g0857700 and PAG1, cellular component, involved in the parts of a cell or its extracellular environment.

Function analysis of JcumiR004

Mature miRNA of JcumiR004 is conserved in populus, vitis, Arabidopsis and jatopha (Fig. 3A).

 Figure 3 

JcumiR004 miRNA and precursor. (A): JcumiR004 is conserved in populus, vitis and Arabidopsis. (B): Precursor of JcumiR004 in jatropha with free energies ΔG -44.30. (C): RNA gel blots: total RNA from fruit was probed with labeled oligonucleotides. The 5S RNA bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining of polyacrylamide gels and served as loading controls. miRCURY locked nucleic acid (LNA:+) probe (Exiqon, Denmark): 5DigN/G+A+T +ATT GG+C +ACGGC+TCA+ATCA

Int J Biol Sci Image

Expressions of primary JcumiR004 were relatively high in developing fruit while not in mature seed (Fig. 2). RNA gel blot of JcumiR004 was done in fruit, the most important organ for jatropha oil yield and quality traits. The size of the RNAs were estimated to be around 20 and 100nt corresponding to mature (21nt) and precursor (~97nt) of JcumiR004. The result showed that both mature miRNA and precursor of JcumiR004 were abundant in developing fruits while not in matured (Fig. 3C). It was therefore suggested that JcumiR004 could be actively involved in fruit formation or development. Precursor of JcumiR004 was isolated by 3' and 5' RACE for further analysis. A good loop stem structure of the precursor was isolated with free energies ΔG=-44.30 as shown in Fig. 3B. The primary miRNA harboring this precursor is used for further function analysis by VIGS.

When examining the effect of TRV VIGS to silence JcumiR004 primary miRNA gene, we observed that TRV:JcumiR004 was able to induce a photo-bleaching and different spots on the leaf. After twenty days post-infiltration (dpi), the photo bleaching phenotype of JcumiR004 was seen (Fig. 4A).

By silencing JcumiR004 primary miRNA in TRV:JcumiR004 plants, the expression level of JcumiR004 was decreased after the primary miRNA knockdown (Fig. 4A). The expression levels of JcumiR004 target genes in plants infiltrated with TRV: JcumiR004 plants were significantly increased as compared to the plants with vector control (Fig. 4B). The results revealed that expression levels of these target genes could be obviously increased by silencing primary miRNA of JcumiR004. The transcripts of UBC22, Os01g0857700, PAG1 and ARF7 were significantly increased by 41.5, 6.5, 93.4 and 18.5 folds.

Gas chromatographic (GC) analysis showed significantly lower linoleic acid (C18:2) levels in plants with JcumiR004 primay miRNA silenced as compared to vector control (Table 2). The other compositions of fatty acid remained unchanged. It would be interesting to further investigate which gene(s) involved in jatropha fatty acid metabolism pathway was modulated by JcumiR004.

 Figure 4 

Variation of phenotypes of jatropha leaf and JcumiRNA target gene expression. (A) Left: Phenotypes of jatropha plants at 18 days post-infiltration (dpi) with TRV vector (left) and TRV: JcumiR004 (right) plants; Right: Primary miRNA of JcuLmiR004 was reduced in plants infiltrated with TRV: JcuLmiR004 compared to plants with TRV vector. (B) JcumiR004 target gene expression levels in plants infiltrated with TRV vectors and TRV: JcumiR004 plants. Numbers represent mean relative values from three independent experiments with standard deviation 1: UBC22 gene, 2: Os01g0857700, 3: PAG1 and 4: ARF7.

Int J Biol Sci Image
 Table 2 

Fatty acid (FA) composition of systemic leaves from plants infiltrated with empty vector and TRV:JcumiR004.


Numbers in each column refer to the relative molar ratios of the different FA with the total being 100%. Means and standard deviation are calculated with three replications.


JcumiRNA cloning

The identification of miRNAs and targets will lay the foundation to unravel the complex miRNA-mediated regulatory networks controlling development and other physiological processes. In this study, using an experimental approach, we provide evidence for the existence of 52 miRNA in jatropha. Up to now, miRNA identification in plants using a cloning approach has been limited to Arabidopsis, rice, Populus, wheat [25] and castor bean [26].

IZeng et al. reported that a substantial number of miRNAs previously identified and characterized in model plants were conserved in four agrieconomically important Euphorbiaceous plants, Castor bean (Ricinus communis), Cassava (Manihot esculenta), Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) and jatropha [26]. They predicted 85 conserved miRNAs in Castor bean, and experimentally verified and characterized 58 (68.2%) of the 85 miRNAs in at least one of four Euphorbiaceous species, including jatropha during normal seedling development. In this study, cloning directly from jatropha leaves and seeds led to identification of 52 jatropha miRNAs with 45 novel ones. Among the 52 jatropha miRNAs, primary miRNAs of 48 miRNAs were identified in other species than jatropha, revealing most of miRNAs are novel and conserved across plants. Future large scale experimental approaches and jatropha EST data will be likely to identify additional miRNAs from jatropha.

JcumiRNAs exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns

The JcumiRNAs in this study were identified to be homologous miRNAs in other plant species. Despite the existence of miRNA sequence conservation between jatropha and other plants, these homologous miRNAs exhibit contrasting tissue-specific expression patterns. Fruit and seed are most important for jatropha oil productivity. In this study, half of JcumiRNAs isolated from leaf did not expressed in fruit or seed, while all miRNAs isolated from seed expressed abundantly in fruit and seed. There could be certain JcumiRNAs related to seed development or seed oil metabolism pathway.

Predicted targets of JcumiRNAs might play roles in a broad range of biological functions

The identification of miRNA targets is essential for understanding miRNA functions. Although our EST data base is relatively small, we still identified quite many putative targets to the isolated miRNAs, which showing that the miRNA target genes encoded a broad range of proteins. Sixteen targets had clear BLASTX hits to the Uniprot database and were associated with genes belonging to the three major gene ontology categories of biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The majority of the predicted protein products in this study were involved in molecular function and cellular component ontologies. Four targets of JcumiR004 were screened, which are homologous to four genes. Predicted protein products of the four targets involved in molecular function and cellular component ontologies.

Identification of miRNAs and their targets is challenging, which was often done computationally. Even though computational target prediction has been successful, but false positive rates exist (11). After we predicted four putative targets of JcumiR004 based on complementarities, we have further validated the putative targets through examining their expression variation by silencing the corresponding primary miRNA through VIGS. Further reporter assay is still needed to see how mutation of the JcumiR004 seed match is going to affect this target expression. The biological significance of silencing primary JcumiR004 is to silence or downregulate mature Jcumi004 but to upregulate target gene expression by relieving the repressive effect of mature Jcumi004 on their target protein-coding genes.

In this case, upregulations of the target genes' expressions are desirable. Among these targets, UBC plays important functions in many aspects of plant growth and development, including phytohormone and light signalling, embryogenesis, organogenesis, leaf senescence and plant defense (for review, see [27]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 37 proteins with a UBC domain and active-site cysteine are predicted [28]. However, the biological functions of these genes remain largely uncharacterized [29]. Here we found that UBC22 gene is a target of JcumiRNA, which will be beneficial for further study on UBC gene family. BUD31 (G10 family) protein gene was reported to be involved in pre-mRNA splicing [30]. PAG1, a 20S proteasome subunit in Arabidopsis development, is essential for growth and development [31]. Auxin Response Factor (ARF) gene family products regulate auxin-mediated transcriptional activation/repression [32].

Despite of the limited sequences of the cDNA library, we predicted 28 targets which could be expected to play roles in a broad range of biological functions.

JcumiR004 affects jatropha oil traits

Oil traits are among the most important traits in jatropha breeding. Plant oils are mostly composed of five common FA, namely palmitic acid (16:0), stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1), linoleic acid (18:2) and linolenic acid (18:3). Normal jatropha seed oil is mainly composed of oleate (35%-50%), linoleate (30%-45%) and palmitate (10%) [6]. Here we found that JcumiR004 can affect oil composition of jatropha leaf by changing linoleic acid. Although the TRV system applied in this study worked in jatropha leaf, the results provide a useful reference for research on jatropha fruit and seed development [21]. It would be intriguing to investigate what gene regulated by JcumiR004 is involved in oil composition. It is necessary to search for more target genes of JcumiR004. Relationships among JcumiR004 and its target genes involved in oil pathway will be investigated to study its metabolism pathway. More targets of Jcumi004 could be indentified as the genome information getting richer.

In this study, real time PCR showed that primary JcumiR004 expressed ubiquitously in all the tissues of root, stem, leaf, developing fruit and mature seed. Silencing primary JcumiR004 led to not only upregulation of the 4 targets involved in various aspects of plant growth and development, but also modulation of C18:2 composition in fatty acid. Taken together, it has been revealed that JcumiR004, as an example of the miRNA directly isolated from jatropha, play important roles in a broad range of biological functions related to agronomic traits including oil composition. We could expect that the miRNAs in jatropha may be an indispensible factor to the rich phenotypic variation in Jatropha curcas.

In conclusion, we produced a collection of 52 miRNAs and 28 targets in jatropha. Different expression patterns of miRNAs in root, stem, leave, fruit and seed were detected. As an example of the miRNA directly isolated from jatropha, we analyzed JcumiR004 on its expression profiles of primary and mature miRNA, its functions on regulation of four targets, and its modulation of C18:2 composition in fatty acid. The data in this study revealed jatropha miRNAs' diverse roles in broad range of biological functions.

Experimental procedures

Plant materials

For small RNA libraries construction and real time PCR, tissues of root, stem and leaf were collected from Jatropha curcas seedlings with 2-3 true leaves while developing fruit and mature seed were from fully grown plants. Jatropha seeds were germinated in a greenhouse and seedlings with 2-3 true leaves were used for VIGS assays.

Small RNA Isolation

Enrichment of small RNAs from total RNA was performed with mirVana™ miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, CA, USA) and then was separated on a denaturing 15% polyacrylamide gel. The nucleotides from positions 19-26 bp were size fractionated. RNA was eluted overnight with 0.4 M NaCl at 4°C and recovered by ethanol precipitation with glycogen. The purified small RNAs were then ligated to (5'-(Pu)uuAACCGCGAATTCCAG(idT)-3'; (where lowercase letters indicate RNA, uppercase letters indicate DNA, Pu denotes 5'-phosphorylated uridine, and idT represents 3'-inverted deoxythymidine.) and 5' adaptor (5'-GACCACGCGTATCGGGCACCACGTATGCTATCGATCGTGAGATGGG-3'), and miRNA libraries were constructed as described [22]. Reverse transcription was performed with PowerScript reverse transcriptase (Clontech, CA, USA) and RT primer to get the first strand cDNA for further analysis. The oligonucleotides used for the procedures were described in [22].

Prediction of stem-loop structures

The RNA sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis against other genomes: Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa and Euphorbia genistoides. We followed the following criteria [23], [33] for selecting the candidates of potential miRNAs or pre-miRNAs: (1) predicted mature miRNAs had only 0-3 nucleotide mismatches in sequence with all previously known plant mature miRNAs; (2) Sequences of miRNA precursors can fold into a hairpin secondary structure that contains the ~22 nt mature miRNA sequence within one arm of the hairpin; (3) miRNA had 30-70% contents of A+U; (4) miRNA had less than six mismatches with the opposite miRNA* sequence in the other arm; and (5) no loop or break in miRNA sequences was allowed.

Secondary structures were predicted by using the mfold program (www. with the default parameters [34]. In each case, only the lowest energy structure was selected for manual inspection, as described by [12]. Small RNA sequences were folded with flanking sequences in five contexts: (1) 300 bp upstream and 20 bp downstream, (2) 150 bp upstream and 20 bp downstream; (3) 150 bp upstream and 150 downstream, (4) 20 bp upstream and 150 downstream, and (5) 20 bp upstream and 300 bp downstream.

Examining miRNA expressions

Total RNAs of jatropha root, stem, leaf, fruit and seed were isolated using plant RNA purification reagent (Invitrogen). Root, stem and leaf were harvest from the seedlings 2 weeks post seeding. Fruit was harvest 1 to 2 weeks after pollination, which is at its formation and developing stage. Seed are mature ones ready for oil extraction.

For examining expressions of miRNAs in different tissues, quantitative real time PCR was applied. Briefly, poly(A) tails were then added to the 3' end of the RNAs by poly(A) polymerase (Ambion), and the polyadenylated RNAs were reverse transcribed by SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with the oligo(dT) 3'-RACE adaptor (Ambion). To amplify the miRNA from the reverse transcribed cDNAs, we used the miRNA sequence as the forward primer and the 3'-RACE outer primer (Ambion) as the reverse primer, as described in [14]. Real-time RT-PCR was conducted with Real-Time PCR machine (I-Cycle, BioRad). The Jatropha 18S rRNA was selected as the endogenous reference. After PCR was finished, the PCR specificity is examined by 3% agarose gel using 5 μl from each reaction to check the right product length and make sure no primer dimer or non-specific amplicons.

For examining expressions of miRNAs in fruit harvested 1 to 2 weeks after pollination and mature fruit using northern blot, RNA gel blots of mature miRNA were probed with labeled oligonucleotides. Briefly, fifteen micrograms of total RNA and RNA marker were electrophoresed on a 15% urea/polyacrylamide/Tris-borate-EDTA gel, and transferred to nylon membrane Hybond N+ (Amersham Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) by overnight capillary transfer. After electrophoresis, we stained the RNA marker lane with SYBR Green II (Takara Bio) for 5 to 10 min and then photographed the gel aligned with a ruler to estimate the size of RNAs in Northern blot. Membranes were UV-cross-linked using the strataLinker (Stratagene, CA, USA), rinsed in 2×SSC, and probed with 5' Digoxigenin-labeled miRCURY locked nucleic acid (LNA) probe (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Danmark) at 42°C. The tRNA and 5S RNA bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining of polyacrylamide gels and served as loading controls.

Prediction of miRNA targets

For target prediction, we followed a set of rules proposed in earlier reports for predicting miRNA targets [24, 25]. These criteria include allowing one mismatch in the region complementary to nucleotide positions 2 to 12 of the miRNA, but not at position 10/11, which is a predicted cleavage site, and three additional mismatches between positions 12 and 22 but with no more than two continuous mismatches. To identify potential targets for jatropha miRNAs, we searched for antisense hits in a jatropha cDNA library constructed by Dr Yin Zhongchao's group in our institute. Target predictions were performed by searching the jatropha cDNA library database for miRNA complementary sequences, with the “contig assembly” algorithm in Sequencher 4.10.1 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI).

Target gene ontology and functional classification

The targets were categorized on the basis of their homologous gene function. The Blast2GO annotation tool was used to annotate EST sequences of target genes against the SwissProt database using BLASTX with default parameters [35]. The annotation information for target genes was functionally classified through the European Bioinformatics Institute QuickGO interface [36]. The gene ontology numbers for the best homologous hits were used to find molecular function, cellular component, and biological process ontology for these sequences using GO Slimmer in AmiGO database [37].

Analyzing functions of miRNA using VIGS

Generation of recombinant vectors and agrobacterium infiltration: VIGS was conducted following [21]. Briefly, primary miRNA of JcumiR004 were cloned into pTRV2 to generate pTRV2 derivatives. pTRV1, and pTRV2, or pTRV2 derivatives were introduced into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 by electroporation. Agrobacterial cells were grown, collected and resuspended in MMA (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 200μM acetylsyringone) solution to a final OD600 of 1.5. Jatropha plants were infiltrated with cultures either with a syringe or by vacuum. For syringe infiltration, agrobacterial-inocula were delivered into the underside of two or three fully expanded leaf using a 1-mL needleless syringe. For vacuum infiltration, whole plants were submerged into agrobacterial-inocula and subjected to 80-90 kPa vacuum for 5 min, and then quickly releasing the vacuum to allow the inoculums to rapidly enter plant tissues. Infiltrated plants were grown in a growth chamber at 25°C with 16h light ⁄ 8h dark photoperiod cycle.

Determining fatty acid composition using gas chromatography: Total lipid, extracted from 100 mg fresh jatropha leaves, was transmethylated with 3N methanolic-HCl (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) plus 400 µL 2,2,-dimethoxypropane (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Each sample were grinded with liquid nitrogen, divided into 3 copies. The fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) was analyzed by GC using GC Agilent 6890 (Palo Alto, CA, USA) employing helium as the carrier gas and DB-23 columns for components separation. The GC analytical method was performed at 140°C for 50 s and a 30°C min-1 ramp to 240°C, and the final temperature was maintained for 50 s for a total run time of 32 min. FA composition value included in the analyses was calculated based on peak area.


The work is part of the project “Genetic Improvement of Jatropha” initiated and coordinated by Professor Nam-Hai Chua. We thank Dr Yin Zhongchao in our institute providing the cDNA library database. We also thank our sequencing facility for helping DNA sequencing and genotyping.


This project is financially supported by JOIL Pte Limited and the internal fund of the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Supplementary Materials

 Additional File 1 

Supplementary Figure 1. Stem-loop structures of 52 putative miRNA precursors.

 Additional File 2 

Supplementary Table 1. The predicted targets of conserved and newly identified jatropha miRNAs.



1. Moxon S, Jing R, Szittya G, Schwach F, Rusholme Pilcher RL, Moulton V. et al. Deep sequencing of tomato short RNAs identifies microRNAs targeting genes involved in fruit ripening. Genome Res. 2008;18:1602

2. Ambros V, Lee RC, Lavanway A, Williams PT, Jewell D. MicroRNAs and other tiny endogenous RNAs in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2003;13:807-18

3. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function. Cell. 2004;116:281-97

4. German MA, Luo S, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ. Construction of Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) libraries for the study of cleaved miRNA targets and the RNA degradome. Nature protocols. 2009;4:356-62

5. Dugas DV, Bartel B. MicroRNA regulation of gene expression in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7:512-20

6. Heller J. Physic nut, Jatropha curcas L. Bioversity International. 1996

7. Shah S, Sharma A, Gupta M. Extraction of oil from Jatropha curcas L. seed kernels by combination of ultrasonication and aqueous enzymatic oil extraction. BioRes Technol. 2005;96:121-3

8. Achten WMJ, Maes W, Aerts R, Verchot L, Trabucco A, Mathijs E. et al. Jatropha: from global hype to local opportunity. J Arid Biol. 2010;74:164-5

9. Jain S, Sharma M. Prospects of biodiesel from Jatropha in India: A review. Renew Energ Stor. 2010;14:763-71

10. Wang CM, Liu P, Yi C, Gu K, Sun F, Li L. et al. A First Generation Microsatellite-and SNP-Based Linkage Map of Jatropha. PloS one. 2011;6:e23632

11. Liu P, Chun Ming Wang, Lei Li, Fei Sun, Peng Liu, Gen Hua Yue. Mapping QTLs for oil traits and eQTLs for oleosin genes in jatropha. BMC Plant J. 2011 Accepted

12. Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513-20

13. Yoo BC, Kragler F, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Haywood V, Archer-Evans S, Lee YM. et al. A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1979

14. Lu S, Sun YH, Shi R, Clark C, Li L, Chiang VL. Novel and mechanical stress-responsive microRNAs in Populus trichocarpa that are absent from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2186

15. Hammell M, Long D, Zhang L, Lee A, Carmack CS, Han M. et al. mirWIP: microRNA target prediction based on microRNA-containing ribonucleoprotein-enriched transcripts. Nature methods. 2008;5:813-9

16. Wang Z. MicroRNA interference technologies. Springer Verlag. 2009

17. Weiler J, Hunziker J, Hall J. Anti-miRNA oligonucleotides (AMOs): ammunition to target miRNAs implicated in human disease?. Gene Ther. 2005;13:496-502

18. Krützfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M. et al. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with 'antagomirs'. Nature. 2005;438:685-9

19. Nicolas FE, Pais H, Schwach F, Lindow M, Kauppinen S, Moulton V. et al. Experimental identification of microRNA-140 targets by silencing and overexpressing miR-140. RNA. 2008;14:2513

20. Vaistij FE, Elias L, George GL, Jones L. Suppression of microRNA accumulation via RNA interference in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2010:1-7

21. Ye J, Qu J, Bui HTN, Chua NH. Rapid analysis of Jatropha curcas gene functions by virus-induced gene silencing. Plant Biotech J. 2009;7:964-76

22. Takada S, Berezikov E, Yamashita Y, Lagos-Quintana M, Kloosterman WP, Enomoto M. et al. Mouse microRNA profiles determined with a new and sensitive cloning method. Nucl Acids Res. 2006;34:e115

23. Ambros V, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Burge CB, Carrington JC, Chen X. et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA. 2003;9:277

24. Sunkar R, Girke T, Zhu JK. Identification and characterization of endogenous small interfering RNAs from rice. Nucl Acids Res. 2005;33:4443

25. Yao Y, Guo G, Ni Z, Sunkar R, Du J, Zhu JK. et al. Cloning and characterization of microRNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome Biol. 2007;8:R96

26. Zeng C, Wang W, Zheng Y, Chen X, Bo W, Song S. et al. Conservation and divergence of microRNAs and their functions in Euphorbiaceous plants. Nucl Acids Res. 2010;38:981

27. Dreher K, Callis J. Ubiquitin, hormones and biotic stress in plants. Ann Botany. 2007;99:787

28. Kraft E, Stone SL, Ma L, Su N, Gao Y, Lau OS. et al. Genome analysis and functional characterization of the E2 and RING-type E3 ligase ubiquitination enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2005;139:1597

29. Xu L, Ménard R, Berr A, Fuchs J, Cognat V, Meyer D. et al. The E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes, AtUBC1 and AtUBC2, play redundant roles and are involved in activation of FLC expression and repression of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2009;57:279-88

30. Wang BB, Brendel V. The ASRG database: identification and survey of Arabidopsis thaliana genes involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R102

31. Egelund J. Blast-, alignment-and phylogenetic analysis of PAG1 [PhD]. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. 2001

32. Okushima Y, Overvoorde PJ, Arima K, Alonso JM, Chan A, Chang C. et al. Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell. 2005;17:444

33. Zhang B, Pan X, Cannon CH, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Conservation and divergence of plant microRNA genes. Plant J. 2006;46:243-59

34. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucl Acids Res. 2003;31:3406

35. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674

36. Binns D, Dimmer E, Huntley R, Barrell D, O'Donovan C, Apweiler R. QuickGO: a web-based tool for Gene Ontology searching. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:3045

37. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, Lee V, Dimmer E, Maslen J. et al. The Gene Ontology annotation (GOA) database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucl Acids Res. 2004;32:D262

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Dr Gen Hua Yue, Tel: 65-68727405, Fax: 65-68727007, Email:

Received 2011-10-19
Accepted 2012-2-20
Published 2012-2-28

Citation styles

Wang, C.M., Liu, P., Sun, F., Li, L., Liu, P., Ye, J., Yue, G.H. (2012). Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 8(3), 418-429.

Wang, C.M.; Liu, P.; Sun, F.; Li, L.; Liu, P.; Ye, J.; Yue, G.H. Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8 (3), 418-429. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.3676.

Wang CM, Liu P, Sun F, Li L, Liu P, Ye J, Yue GH. Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas. Int J Biol Sci 2012; 8(3):418-429. doi:10.7150/ijbs.3676.

Wang CM, Liu P, Sun F, Li L, Liu P, Ye J, Yue GH. 2012. Isolation and Identification of miRNAs in Jatropha curcas. Int J Biol Sci. 8(3):418-429.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) License. See for full terms and conditions.
Popup Image