1. Henan International Joint Laboratory for Nuclear Protein Regulation, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
2. School of Stomatology, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
3. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Dar es Salaam University College of Education, Dar es Salaam 2329, Tanzania
4. Kaifeng Municipal Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Centre for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
5. Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab 56400, Pakistan
6. School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
7. Institute for Innovative Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
8. Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Infection and Biological Safety, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China
In recent years, a vast number of potential cancer therapeutic targets have emerged. However, developing efficient and effective drugs for the targets is of major concern. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), one of the three known gasotransmitters, is involved in the regulation of various cellular activities such as autophagy, apoptosis, migration, and proliferation. Low production of H2S has been identified in numerous cancer types. Treating cancer cells with H2S donors is the common experimental technique used to improve H2S levels; however, the outcome depends on the concentration/dose, time, cell type, and sometimes the drug used. Both natural and synthesized donors are available for this purpose, although their effects vary independently ranging from strong cancer suppressors to promoters. Nonetheless, numerous signaling pathways have been reported to be altered following the treatments with H2S donors which suggest their potential in cancer treatment. This review will analyze the potential of H2S donors in cancer therapy by summarizing key cellular processes and mechanisms involved.
Keywords: Hydrogen sulfide, H2S donors, Cancer, Signaling pathways, Cellular processes
Cancer has remained as one of the most investigated diseases in scientific research, and many potential therapeutic targets have been discovered. However, developing the most effective and highly efficient combination therapy against the extremely resistant metastatic cancer cells is still a challenge. In 2018, the worldwide estimation of cancer new cases was 18.1 and the mortality numbers were 9.6 million , which is an increase of more than 28% and 17% respectively from the 2012 report . This enormous increase in new cases demands for the new and effective therapeutic option for the disease. Cellular activities such as autophagy, apoptosis, migration and proliferation that are known to be altered in cancer cells serve as the main therapeutic targets [3-5]. Therefore, the identification of potential compounds that can effectively regulate these activities to bring about anti-cancer properties is essential in determining potential treatments.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is the third gaseous neurotransmitter to be associated with the regulation of pathophysiological processes, next to carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) [6, 7]. H2S is initially synthesized in the cells by the enzymatic reactions involving cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS), 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MPST) and cystathionine gamma-lyase (CTH/CSE) enzymes [6, 8, 9]. H2S plays a vital role in the establishment and progression of multiple health disorders ranging from non-cancerous [10, 11] to cancerous [12, 13]. In cancer, H2S participates in both the suppression [12, 14-17] and progression of the disease [13, 18].
H2S donors are naturally or synthetically derived H2S-releasing compounds. Some of the commonly used H2S donors include sodium polysulthionate, 1,2-dithiole-3-thiones, modified non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfide-containing salts, sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), sodium sulfide, garlic-derived natural sulfides, allyl methyl sulfide, dipropyl disulfide, diallyl sulfide (DAS), diallyl disulfide (DADS), diallyl trisulfide (DATS), Lawesson's reagents, morpholin-4-ium-4-methoxyphenyl(morpholino) phosphinodithioate (GYY4137) and its derivatives, diclofenac derivative, 4-(3-thioxo-3H-1,2-dithiol-5-yl)phenyl ester-2-[(2,6-dichlorophenyl) amino]-benzeneacetic acid, phenol derivative, 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (ADT-OH), mesalamine derivative, 5-amino-2-hydroxy-benzoic acid 4-(5-thioxo-5H-[1,2]dithiol-3-yl)-phenyl ester hydrochloride, naproxen derivative, 2-(6-methoxynapthalen-2-yl)-propionic acid 4-thiocarbamoyl phenyl ester (ATB-346), and the mitochondria-specific H2S donor, 10-oxo-10-(4-(3-thioxo-3H-1,2-dithiol-5-yl)phenoxy)decyl) triphenylphosphonium bromide [19-21]. In a dose and time-dependent manner, these compounds can further be categorized into fast-releasing donors [22, 23] and slow-releasing donors [14, 24, 25]. Generally, the efficiency of these drugs is determined by parameters such as solubility, toxicity, and formation of byproducts. The donation of H2S occurs through numerous chemical reactions such as hydrolysis, thiol activation, bicarbonate activation, light activation, carboxylesterases metabolism .
Despite the recent developments in the field, the role of H2S donors in cancer development and progression is still disputable. To date, numerous H2S releasing drugs with different properties, donating mechanisms, and capabilities have been synthesized for experimental use. With the exception of their molecular targets, the anti-cancer effects of H2S donors have been extensively reviewed [26-29]. Herein, we will summarize recent findings on the roles of H2S donors in cancer management by illuminating their molecular targets, mechanisms involved and their downstream effects in cellular activities. We further highlight the therapeutic potential of these donors individually or in combination with other drugs.
Relevant articles were searched using PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and Research Gate with the keywords: 'Hydrogen sulfide and cancer', 'Hydrogen sulfide donors and cancer', and by using specific H2S drug names (e.g. 'Diallyl trisulfide and cancer'). In addition to the relevancy of the title and abstracts, articles were selected for inclusion based on the year of publication which was mainly between 2015 and 2020. Though, few older articles were also included to strengthen the knowledge. The articles selected have been cited accordingly.
H2S regulates numerous physiological processes in the body. Both endogenous and exogenous-derived H2S have been shown to participate several physiological activities such as muscle relaxation, water regulation, cytoprotection, and inflammation [30-33]. Low levels of H2S and the downregulation of its producing enzymes are familiar events in cancer cells. The analysis of tissue samples from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients reveals a significant reduction in CBS levels compared to their surrounding non-cancerous tissues and the decrease could be correlated with poor prognosis . Further downregulation of the CBS enzyme using an inhibitor CH004 induces anti-cancer effects via ferroptosis, an iron-dependent programmed cell death in HepG2 cells . Unlike CBS, CSE is upregulated in many cancer types including HCC, gastric and breast cancer, where its endogenous inhibition also has anti-carcinogenic effects [17, 36, 37]. Alternatively, studies have shown that the supplementation of H2S using donors can also induce strong cytoprotective effects in many cancer types [14, 37-39]. Despite the lack of evidence on the normal range of H2S in different cells and the activities leading to its alteration in cancer cells, the available data suggest that only a certain amount of H2S is required for maintaining cellular activities and any adjustment resulting from either increasing or decreasing the level has an enormous impact on cellular activities involved in cancer modulation.
One of the primary mechanisms involved in the H2S-induced cancer regulation is through its interaction with cellular transporter/channels. As a neurotransmitter, H2S has been shown to interact with cell transporters  and ion channels [41-43], resulting in the downstream regulation of cellular activities [43-45]. It has been revealed that the treatment of HEK293 cells with 1 µM-1 mM NaHS inhibits voltage-gated T-type specifically Cav3.2 channels by promoting extracellular binding of zinc (Zn2+) . At the downstream, the suppression of T-type channels can result in enhanced antitumor activities and improved sensitivity of cancer cells to drugs [47-49]. Studies also show that H2S donors can trigger the activation of cellular transporters including ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1)  and glutamine transporter-1 (GLT-1)  by promoting nuclear translocation of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor alpha and inhibiting the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) respectively. However, depending on the cancer type, the activation of ABCA1 and GLT-1 can either have inhibitory or promoting effects [45, 51-53]. Moreover, by interacting with GLT-1, H2S donors can directly participate in modulating aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) which is a metabolic-hallmark of most cancer cells. Therefore, the impact of the activation of the above transporters by H2S donors in cancer should be further examined to clarify the mechanism and the subsequent responses. Besides, H2S can also interact with insulin receptors and toll-like receptors 4 (TLR4), resulting in the inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR , nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-кB)  and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT-3)  pathways together with their corresponding cellular responses.
Another key mechanism involved in the regulation of cellular activities is the functional interconnection between H2S and other gasotransmitters. This potential link between H2S, CO, and NO serves as a crucial mechanism exploited by H2S donors in regulating cancer activities. Exclusively, exogenous treatment with donors of either of the three gasotransmitters can reduce cancer progression by facilitating reactive oxygen species (ROS) tolerance, anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic responses in human breast cancer [56-58]. Moreover, a recent study indicates that treatment with either NO, CO, or H2S donors (namely S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine, carbon monoxide releasing molecule-A1, and GYY4137, respectively) promotes anti-carcinogenic activities in colon cancer cells HCT116 in a dose-dependent manner by regulating AKT, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)/VASP, and P44/42 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways . With respect to the link, study shows that the treatment of cancer cells with DAS, DATS, and diallyl tetrasulfide can significantly reduce tumor growth mechanistically by upregulating heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expressions through MAPK and PI3K-mediated activation of nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor-2 (Nrf-2) pathway [59-61]. The downstream effect of HO-1 is the catalysis of heme to biliverdin, a reaction that releases CO as a byproduct . It is also worth noting that treatment with CO donor photo-CORM [Mn (CO)3] reduces the antioxidant status by inhibiting the bioactivity of H2S producing enzyme CBS in breast cancer cells . Moreover, it has been reported that both the treatment with 20-100 µM NaHS following the inhibition of long non-coding RNA sONE (an endothelial NO regulator) on breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 for 72 hours, or the co-treatment of NaHS with 40-100 µM doses of NO donor diethylenetriamine NO adduct (DETA/NO) can reverse the antitumor effects of NaHS by regulating cGMP pathways . Similarly, NaHS treatment also increases the production of NO and its associated cytoprotective effects in a pH-dependent manner in murine brain homogenate and L1210 leukemia cells conceivably via S-nitrosothiol-signaling pathway . In summary, the above data indicate the interaction between H2S, CO, and NO to play a significant part in regulating cancer activities, which is in addition to its interaction with cell receptors and transporters.
The response of cancer cells to H2S donors varies substantially depending on the donor type, concentration and cancer types. Here, we will discuss the effects of these donors in cancer by illuminating cancer-promoting activities (including immune response, gene transcription and translation, and cell growth), cancer inhibitory events (such as cell cycle arrest, autophagy, and apoptosis), anti-cancer drug sensitivity and in vivo tumor growth.
The immune system plays an important role in maintaining normal cellular activities. In the initial stages of cancer, it helps in tumor inhibition by removing immunogenic cancer cells, however, in later stages it is manipulated to facilitate cancer growth and progression . One of the ways in which cancer cells escape from being destroyed by the immune system is through regulatory T cells (Tregs) . By regulating the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ꞵ), Tregs can markedly promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of HCC cells  and suppress the cytotoxicity of the expanded tumor-specific CD8 T cells . High frequency of FOXP3+ CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells has been shown to facilitate cancer progression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma  and HCC . Though, the binding of ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenases 1 and 2 (Tet 1 and 2) to FOXP3+ can help to maintain the stability and functions of Tregs [72, 73]. A substantial reduction in the expressions of Tet genes has been reported in several cancer types including colon and breast cancer and their upregulation promotes tumor-suppressing effects [74-77]. It has been revealed that treatment with H2S donors can stimulate DNA demethylation and Tregs-associated immune responses in CD4+ T cells by increasing the expressions of Tet 1 and Tet 2 genes via the sulfuration of nuclear transcription factor Y subunit beta in H2S-deficient mice model . However, whether H2S donors can deregulate Tet 1 and 2 in cancer types including ovarian cancer  and where the Tet 1 and 2 genes are overexpressed need to be further investigated.
Peroxynitrite, an extremely reactive compound formed from the reaction between NO and superoxide radicals, is known to promote DNA damage and trigger autoantibody in cancer patients . Filipovic et al. reports that H2S treatment can effectively prevent the effects of peroxynitrite by reacting with the compound under inflammatory conditions to form sulfinyl nitrite, an NO-releasing compound . Furthermore, treatment with NaHS protects glomerulus mesangial and Jurkat cells against antibody-induced cell lysis and apoptosis by sulfurating the humoral effector molecules thereby reducing antibody binding ability . NaHS also suppresses the activation of the complement alternative pathway (AP), an important effector molecule of innate immunity. Regardless, the effect of the inhibition is still uncertain since both overactivation and underactivation of the pathway have been observed in cancer [83, 84]. In addition, whether the event could impair immune response and expose patients to other infections needs further exploration. Collectively, these data imply an essential role of H2S in regulating immune activities and associated diseases including cancer through the regulation of key immune regulators.
The transcription and translation factors are vital entities that regulate the generation of RNA molecules and amino acid sequences respectively [85, 86]. The dysregulation of transcription and translation factors are common events in cancer cells [87, 88]. It has been shown that treatment with H2S donors can effectively regulate numerous transcription factors including NF-кB , STAT-3 , and Nrf-2 [89-91] that are involved in inflammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress events. Moreover, GYY4137 treatment can significantly downregulate the expression of transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF-5) , which in turn regulates the SRY-box transcription factor-4  and NF-кB .
Besides, H2S plays a key role in regulating the post-translation modification of protein via sulfuration . In mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEF) and HeLa cells, treatment with 100 µM NaHS significantly increases the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit alpha (eIF2α) partially through the suppression of protein phosphatase 1c as a result of its persulfidation at cysteine (Cys)-127 . Even though the phosphorylation of eIF2α decreases protein synthesis, the incident can result in the promotion of cell migration and ultimately cancer metastasis . Hence, the interaction between H2S and eIF2-α, and its implication in carcinogenic activities needs to be further investigated. Alternatively, treatment with NaHS or GYY4137 could protect against apoptotic and inflammatory responses by sulfurating the p65 subunit of NF-кB at Cys-38 in monocyte/macrophage THP-1 cells, RAW macrophages and human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells [98, 99]. In addition, NaHS, GYY4137 or DATS treatments improves antioxidant status through post-translation modification of Kelch-like ECH associated protein 1 (Keap 1), a redox-sensitive protein with the first two donors mediating the sulfuration at Cys-151 [100, 101] and the later at Cys-288 residues [100, 102]. Also, a report by Hourihan et al. reveals the formation of a disulfide bond and sulfuration of Keap1 at Cys-226 and Cys-613 following NaHS treatment in COS 1 cells . The resulting sulfuration-induced inhibition of Keap 1 exerts anti-proliferation responses through the activation of the Nrf-2 antioxidant pathway. Meanwhile, in hypertensive rats, GYY4137 treatment attenuates the transcription activities of KLF-5 via S-sulfuration of specificity protein-1 (SP-1) at Cys-664 , thus stimulating anti-cancer responses . Generally, H2S donors interact with key transcription and translation factors involved in cellular activities, most of which are considerably dysregulated in cancer cells which confirm their potential in cancer treatment.
Targeting cell cycle-mediating processes have been identified as a viable therapeutic option for treating numerous disorders including neurodegenerative disorders  and cancer . Cell cycle arrest is an important event responsible for evaluating cellular damages and initiating apoptosis . Cell cycle contains 4 main phases, namely Gap 1 (G1), Synthesis (S), Gap 2 (G2), and Mitosis (M) phase, that are closely monitored by the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints . Besides, cells exit the cycle temporarily or permanently by entering the quiescent/resting phase (G0). The activation of cell cycle regulators, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) helps to switch the cycle on and off . Both cell cycle checkpoints  and CDKs  have been established as the vital targets in cancer treatment. The administration of GYY4137 induces cell cycle arrest at G1/S checkpoint in HCC cells , and S-G2/M phases in colorectal cancer  and breast cancer cells . Moreover, NaHS treatment prevents cell cycle progression by triggering G0/G1 arrest in breast cancer  and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) .
It has also been revealed that treatment with DATS can promote DNA damage and G2/M arrest through the activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase and upregulation of nuclear exportation of cell division cycle 25C protein in thyroid and bladder cancer [114, 115], and by delaying nuclear translocalization of CDK1 in prostate cancer . Moreover, DATS increases the expressions of intercellular cyclins (A2 and B1), apoptotic markers (Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), p53, cleaved caspase 8, 9, and cytochrome c) and histone 3 phosphorylation in gastric cancer [117, 118]. In osteosarcoma cells, DATS treatment mediates ROS-dependent G0/G1 arrest by suppressing the protein expressions of cyclin D1 and increasing those of p21 and p27 . The protective effects of DATS is induced via the activation of MAPK and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as well as the inhibition of PI3K/Nrf-2/AKT pathways [117-119].
Besides, treatment with DADS also induces G2/M arrests in pancreatic , ovarian , and colon cancer cells  by promoting DNA-damage and activating mitochondria apoptotic pathways. In summary, H2S donors regulate cell cycle progression by interacting with cell cycle regulators and checkpoints, suggesting the potential of these compounds in cancer treatment.
Cancer cells are characterized by abnormal/uncontrolled proliferation resulting into their accumulation. The link between cell cycle regulators and signaling pathways plays a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation and viability. H2S donors modulate cell proliferation and viability by interacting with the cell cycle regulators and related signaling pathways [118, 119, 123]. In colon and breast cancer, GYY4137 treatment attenuates pro-proliferation activities by promoting cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and necrosis [14, 15]. Also, treatment with DATS decreases cell viability and proliferation in gastric cancer , osteosarcoma , and glioma  through the activation of MAPK and suppression of PI3K/AKT cascades, and wingless integrated (Wnt)/beta catenin (ꞵ-catenin) pathways respectively. Concomitantly, treatment with DADS downregulates cyclin D1 and c-myc in osteosarcoma , and CDK1 and Cyclin B1 in ovarian cancer . As a tumor suppressor, NaHS also inhibits the growth of HepG2 cells by regulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway  and that of breast cancer MCF-7 cells via p38 MAPK pathway . Overall, H2S donors regulate cell proliferation and viability in a cell/dose/time-dependent manner by interacting with a wide range of signaling cascades. The above evidences indicate that these donors can serve as a potential candidate in cancer treatment through their ability to regulate key cellular pathways associated with proliferation and viability activities. The summary anti-cancer pathways regulated by H2S donors is depicted in Figure 1.
Migration and invasion are key players in cancer metastasis and progression. Under these processes, an individual or a collective cluster/strand/cords of cancer cell(s) detach from the primary tumor, penetrate the stroma of the surrounding tissue, enter the blood vessels, and eventually be transported into other organs . The whole process is regulated by a comprehensive group of enzymes including extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), adhesive enzymes (E-cadherin), desmosomes, and integrins . It has been revealed that treatment of HCC cells with 600-1000 µM NaHS effectively inhibits migration and invasion in a concentration-dependent fashion through the regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/ERK/MMP-2 and PTEN/AKT pathways . Similarly, in thyroid cancer cells, 200 µM NaHS treatment inhibits migration activities by deactivating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways . In lung cancer A549 cells, treatment with 100 µM NaHS significantly reduces nickel-induced EMT and migration by regulating TGF-ꞵ1 pathway . Moreover, NaHS decreases the protein levels of MMP-2 in gastric cancer , and EMT-inducing snail (SNAI 1) in breast cancer . A previous study conducted using DAS, DADS, and DATS in colon cancer Caco-2 cells indicates a significant reduction in migration-associated proteins MMP-2, -7, and -9 , with DATS showing the highest inhibition rate followed by DADS and DAS. In colon cancer HT29 cells, DATS prevents the angiogenesis and migration by suppressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), MMPs and inhibiting p38MAPK, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and JNK signaling cascades . Similarly, DATS reduces the migration and invasion of glioma cells by impeding the activation of Wnt/ꞵ-catenin pathways . Besides, treatment with DADS prevents migration and invasion of breast cancer stem cells by suppressing the glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase M2-induced activation of the AMPK pathway as well as by increasing and decreasing the levels of E-cadherin and vimentin, respectively . The treatment with DADS also inhibits Rac1/PAK1/LIMK1/cofilins signaling cascades in colon and gastric cancer [132, 133]. The above data suggest that H2S donors regulate migration and invasion activities through their interactions with numerous pathways and enzymes (Figure 2).
The diagrammatic illustration of the pathways regulated by H2S donors in cancer suppression. H2S donors regulate STAT-3, MAPK, AMPK, PI3K-mTOR, p53, ATM-CHK1/2-CDC25C, NF-кB, and Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk pathways together with the intercellular pH and cell cycle regulators resulting into the inhibition of cell cycle progression and promotion apoptosis. (STAT-3: signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; p53: tumor protein 53; ATM: ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase; CHK1/2: checkpoint kinases 1/2; CDC25C: cell division cycle 25 C protein; NF-кB: nuclear factor-kappa B; Raf: rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase)
Autophagy is a key process involved in maintenance of cell homeostasis by degrading damaged organelles and misfolded proteins, thereby recycling nutrients and other essential materials . Autophagy is associated with both tumor suppression and progression depending on the tumor stage [135-140]. The mTOR pathway has a decisive role in regulating autophagy, therefore targeting this pathway directly or indirectly through its upstream regulators helps in modulating the process . One of the main events used to confirm the occurrence of autophagy is the conjugation of microtubule-associated protein 1A/B light chain 3, LC3 I to LC3 II, which is incorporated into the complex degradation machinery . A study by Yue et al. shows a significant increase in protein levels of LC3 II accompanied by the inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway following the treatment of MG-63 osteosarcoma cells with DADS . Similarly, in myeloid leukemia cells, treatment with DADS decreases cell viability and increases apoptosis by inactivating the mTOR pathway . Moreover, the administration of NaHS effectively triggers protective autophagy in HCC cells by regulating the mTOR pathway . Collectively, these data identify the interaction of H2S donors with the mTOR signaling pathway as a crucial event in promoting autophagy and apoptosis thence preventing cancer progression.
Apoptosis, a caspase-dependent programmed cell death, is amongst the highly investigated targets in cancer treatment. It helps to maintain normal cell metabolism by destroying specific cells that are not required without affecting their healthy neighbours . So far three major signaling pathways namely intrinsic, extrinsic , and perforin/granzyme B pathway  are known to induce apoptosis, all of which play an essential role in cancer modulation. Mitochondria, cell surface death receptors/adaptor proteins and the immune system are the main regulators for each pathway respectively. The activation of cysteine protease enzymes known as caspases is the common objective for all apoptotic pathways which result in the initiation and execution of proteolytic degradation by cleaving specific substrates such as poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) and DNA fragmentation factor . Apoptotic pathways principally rely on pro- apoptotic caspase-2, -8, -9, and -10 for the initiation phase and caspase-3, -6, and-7 for the execution phase .
H2S donors regulate apoptosis in cancer cells by interacting with numerous apoptosis-inducing pathways [15, 149]. The treatment with GYY4137 elevates the expressions of apoptotic markers caspase-9 and cleaved PARP in breast cancer MCF-7 cells, colorectal cancer Caco-2 cells , and ovarian cancer A2780 cells , with little or no effects in normal cell lines IMR90 cells  and Ea. hy926 . STAT-3 pathway plays a crucial role in inducing apoptosis, and blocking this pathway is associated with improved apoptotic activities in different cancer types including lung cancer , pancreatic cancer , and HCC . Treatment with GYY4137 significantly increases apoptotic activities in HCC cells by preventing both interleukin-6 and JAK-2 induced phosphorylation of STAT-3 .
Furthermore, treatment with NaHS upregulates the expressions of apoptosis-related genes caspase-3 and Bax and suppresses that of anti-apoptotic marker B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) by regulating p38 MAPK and p53 pathways . Likewise, treatment of human melanoma cells with ATB-346 promotes cell death by reducing the activities of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inhibiting AKT and NF-кB signaling pathways . It has also been shown that the administration of ADT-OH can enhance anti-cancer activities in melanoma by reducing makorin ring finger protein 1 levels and preventing the degradation of IkBα, resulting in the accumulation of apoptotic adaptor protein Fas-associated protein with death domain and inhibition of NF-кB, respectively . In different cancer types, treatment with DATS has been shown to induce cell death by promoting mitochondria-mediated DNA damage  and by regulating AMPK , c-JUN N-terminal kinases (JNK) , PI3K/AKT , p38MAPK , and NF-кB  signaling pathways. Likewise, DADS treatment suppresses cancer progression by facilitating DNA damage  and inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR [142, 143] and NF-кB pathways . In addition, compared to NaHS and GYY4137 treatments, breast cancer cells show extremely high apoptotic index when administered with HA-ADT (a conjugate formed with hyaluronic acid (HA) and ADT-OH) .
The diagrammatic illustration of the mechanism by H2S donors in regulating autophagy and cell migration. H2S reduces the levels of p62 and elevates those of Atg5 and LC3-II to facilitate the formation of autophagosomes resulting in autophagy. Also, H2S suppresses the protein levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT and mTOR resulting in the downstream regulation of p-70S6K expressions and subsequently autophagy. By regulating PI3K, H2S also downregulates the expressions of Rac-1, PAK-1, and cofilin thereby reducing MMP-2, -7, -9, N-cadherin and vimentin levels, and increases TIMP 3 and E-cadherin levels resulting in the inhibition of cell migration. H2S further activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway to suppress migration activities, and inhibits NF-қB and MAPK pathways to reduce migration and invasion activities. (p62: nucleoporin 62; Atg5: autophagy-related protein 5; LC3 II: LC3-phosphatidylethanolamine conjugate; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; AKT: protein Kinase B; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; p-70S6K: ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1; Rac-1: Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; PAK-1: p21-activated kinase 1; MMPs: matrix metalloproteinases; TIMP 3: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB: nuclear factor-kappa B).
The extracellular acidic microenvironment is the key feature that differentiates cancer cells from non-cancer cells . The high rate of glycolysis in cancer cells results in the accumulation of lactic acid, leading to the reduction of intracellular pH (pHi) . Anion exchangers (AEs) and sodium/proton exchangers (NHEs) are key regulators of intracellular acidity recruited to adjust the decreasing pHi via active transportation of proton (H+) to the extracellular environment, making it more acidic compared to the intracellular environment [160, 161]. A previous study indicates that low pHi enhances apoptosis through DNA fragmentation and activation of caspases . It has been revealed that treatment with GYY4137 increases intracellular acidity by promoting glycolysis and inhibiting the activities of NHEs and AEs [150, 163]. However, compared to GYY4137, FW1010 (a structural analogue of GYY4137) promotes pHi-mediated cell death more efficiently . Moreover, synergizing GYY4137 with metformin (glycolysis-inducing type 2 diabetes mellitus drug) or simvastatin (a cholesterol/lipid-lowering drug targeting monocarboxylate transporter-4 (MCT-4)) aggravates the hyperacidity-induced cell death compared to treatment with individual drugs . This confirms that the interaction of donors with glycolysis in cancer suppression, and suggests a new direction of combination therapy comprising of H2S donors and glycolysis regulators (Figure 3). Overall, donor type and concentration play key roles in the regulation of apoptosis, however, slow-releasing donors and garlic-derived donors are more effective and efficient compared to the fast-releasing H2S donors. Regardless, their abilities to induce apoptosis by promoting intracellular acidification and activating both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways suggest these donors can be used to target the majority of apoptotic pathways altered in cancer cells.
Targeting cancer cells with more than one drug (combination therapy) that targets more than one pathway helps to reduce drug resistance and increase the efficiency of the treatment . The combination therapy can be chemotherapy and radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, radiotherapy and surgery, or all three. In addition to their abilities to induce anti-cancer effects in drug resistant cancer cells such as cisplatin-resistant NSCLC A549/DPP cells , H2S donors improve the sensitivity and reduce resistance to anti-cancer drugs [118, 166]. The downregulation of metallothionein 2A (MT2A), a stress protein is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients . It has been reported that DATS treatment can elevate both the mRNA and protein levels of MT2A, thereby improving the sensitivity of the anti-cancer drug, docetaxel (DOC), as well as the survival of gastric cancer patients . In human osteosarcoma cells, treatment with DATS reduces drug resistance by suppressing multidrug resistance protein 1 (P-gp1) . Furthermore, NaHS improves radiosensitivity in breast cancer by increasing tumor oxygen levels . NaHS also decreases hepatotoxicity induced by anti-cancer drug, methotrexate (MTX) . Collectively, cancer cells treated with donor-containing combination therapy demonstrate enhanced sensitivity and reduced drug resistance. Despite the need for further investigation, the data above indicate that H2S donors can regulate sensitivity and resistance-associated genes to enhance the anti-cancer activities of other drugs and further support their potential in cancer treatment.
In vivo xenograft tumor mice model is the most commonly used preclinical tool to determine the drug delivery system and response . Under the assessment, several parameters such as body weight, tumor mass, tumor volume, and protein expressions are analyzed and the results are compared with the control group. It has been shown that treatment of breast cancer tumor mice model with HA-ADT donor can effectively inhibit tumor growth and proliferation . Moreover, the treatment of leukemia xenograft tumor model with 100-300 mg/kg GYY4137 shows a significant reduction in tumor volume with no change in body weight or gross behaviour . GYY4137 donor (50 mg/kg/day) also reduces subcutaneous HepG2 tumor growth by regulating STAT-3 pathway . Besides, treatment with DADS/DATS inhibits in vivo tumor growth by reducing tumor size, weight, and regulating several factors involved in cancer progression [123, 130, 131]. A study by Chandra-Kuntal, et al. also reports a significant reduction in tumor size and the downregulation of p-STAT-3 levels following the treatment of prostate cancer mice model with 2 mg DATS . In colon and gastric cancer mice model, DADS treatment promotes anti-cancer responses by reducing the level of vimentin and increasing that of E-cadherin [132, 133]. Similarly, the treatment of HCC xenograft nude mice model with 0.8-1 mM NaHS can effectively inhibit tumor growth and progression . In summary, the evidence suggests that H2S donors have a dominant anti-cancer effect by reducing tumor volume, weight, growth, and regulating p-STAT-3 levels in a concentration-dependent manner.
An illustration of the combination effect of H2S donors, metformin, and simvastatin in facilitating acidification-induced cell death. Metformin inhibits mitochondria complex 1, leading to the accumulation of AMP and the downstream activation of AMPK pathway. Next, AMPK increases NADPH which in turn facilitates the conversion of pyruvate into lactic acid thereby increasing intracellular acidity. H2S donors promote glycolysis and inhibit the activities of intracellular acidity regulators (NHEs and EAs). On the other hand, simvastatin prevents the exportation of lactate by inhibiting MCT-4. Together, all these processes cause cell death by decreasing intracellular pH. (AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NHES: sodium/proton exchangers; AEs: anion exchangers; MCT-4: monocarboxylate transporter-4).
Despite the reported anti-tumor effect of H2S donors, on numerous occasions cancer promoting activities have been reported in different cancer cells when treated with H2S donors especially NaHS. Therefore, we further discuss the tumor promoting effects of these donors and the pathways involved.
The pro-carcinogenic effects of H2S are mainly induced by the facilitation of cell cycle progression and the activation of anti-apoptotic pathways. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with NaHS has been shown to facilitate cell cycle progression by downregulating the protein expressions of the DNA repairing RPA70 and tumor suppressor RB1, while upregulating those of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and CDK4 . In addition, the treatment decreases the expression of cell cycle-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 and activates the AKT/ERK 1/2 pathways . It has also been reported that treatment of multiple myeloma cells with NaHS reduces the proportion of cells in G0/G1 arrest and increases their proportion in S and G2/M phases . In summary, treatment with NaHS can stimulate cell cycle progression by amplifying the activation of AKT/ERK 1/2 signaling cascades.
In addition to the promotion of cell cycle progression, studies also show that treatment with NaHS promotes cell proliferation and viability in esophageal carcinoma via the activation of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and JAK-2/STAT-3 pathways [18, 175]. In HCC cells, NaHS treatment activates EGFR/ERK/MMP-2, PTEN/AKT, STAT-3/COX-2, and NF-кB and inhibits JNK signaling pathways (Figure 4) [126, 176, 177]. Besides, the treatment of oral cancer cells (WSU-HN6, Tca83, and Cal27) with 1000 µM NaHS for 5 hours can enhance cell proliferation by activating COX-2/ERK/AKT pathways . However, conflicting results have been reported in C6 glioma cells where one study shows oncogenic activities induced via the activation of p38MAPK/ERK/COX-2 signaling cascades following 400-1600 µM NaHS treatment , while another study conducted on the same cell line (C6) using 250, 500, and 1000 µM NaHS shows anti-oncogenic effects accompanied by the activation of p38MAPK and p53 pathways . With the dose-dependent and fast-releasing nature of NaHS, the above confusion may be caused by the possible loss of H2S during the preparation of the samples and volatilization of the gas in culture plates, since the half-life of the compound is about 5 minutes of which over 80% of H2S is formed within the first 10 seconds after dissolving the crystals . Although, it's not clear how NaHS could result in stimulation of different MAPK isoforms, leading to the activation or deactivation of apoptotic pathway p53 [181-183]. In addition, it is not well understood as to why the effects of NaHS varies in different cancer types. Together, these data suggest that NaHS can impose pro-proliferating effects on cancer cells by promoting cell cycle progression and regulating the associated pathways.
In vitro studies have reported that the incubation of endothelial cells with NaHS can significantly promote the migration and proliferation activities by stimulating HIF-α/VEGF, cGMP/protein kinase G as well as ATP-mediated potassium channels (KATP)/p38 MAPK cascades [184-186]. In breast tumor-derived endothelial cells, treatment with NaHS results in VEGF-mediated activation of Ca2+ channels and the promotion of cell migration . Besides, treatment of thyroid cancer cells with 25-50 µM NaHS effectively enhances migration and invasion by activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways . The H2S donor-mediated cell migration has also been confirmed by elevated levels of MMP-2 and -9 protein levels in bladder cancer and esophageal carcinoma following administration of NaHS [18, 175, 188]. The cell migration-induced activation of AKT pathways have also been reported in multiple myeloma cells following the administration of NaHS . Meanwhile, in EC 109 and PLC/PRF/5 cells, the treatment signals were via HSP90 and NF-кB pathways, respectively [18, 176]. These data suggest that treatment with H2S donors can intensify cancer metastasis through the regulation of PI3K, NF-кB, and MAPK pathways.
The diagrammatic presentation of cancer-promoting pathways regulated with NaHS treatment. H2S donors stimulate HSP90, HIF-1α, AKT, LDHA, JAK-2, MAPK, KATP, cGMP, and NF-қB, but inhibit JNK pathway to exhibit tumor promoting effects. (HSP90: heat shock protein 90; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha; AKT: protein kinase B; LDHA: lactate dehydrogenase A; JAK-2: Janus kinase 2; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; KATP: ATP-sensitive potassium channels; cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate; NF-кB: nuclear factor-kappa B; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase).
The ability to suppress apoptotic activities is among the key features of cancer cells. Generally, compounds that increase cell apoptosis have great potential in therapeutic application. With respect to H2S donors, despite the observed potential, conflicting reports show a reduction in apoptosis following the treatment with NaHS. For instance, a previous study indicates that treatment with NaHS reduces the expression of apoptotic marker caspase-3 and Bax but increases that of Bcl-2 via the regulation of HSP90 . Similarly, in multiple myeloma, NaHS treatment increases the expression of Bcl-2 and decreases that of caspase-3 via the stimulation of AKT signaling . In addition, it has been reported that NaHS treatment attenuates the expressions of caspase-9 and -12, and elevates those of VEGF and VEGFR in EC 109 cells . In brief, NaHS can interact with key cell regulators, resulting in enhanced pro-cancer effects.
The development and growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones is known as angiogenesis . It is a crucial process in tumor metastasis as it assures the supply of nutrients and other materials that are required for cell growth. In both normal and cancerous cells, angiogenesis is stimulated by VEGF proteins. A previous study suggests that H2S treatment can facilitate angiogenic responses such as microvessel sprouting of aortic ring via the regulation of H2S/NO signaling . It has also been reported that treatment with NaHS induces pro-angiogenic properties by overexpressing HIF-1α and downregulating micro RNA-640 via the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-mTOR pathway . Similarly, a recent study shows that treatment of NSCLC with NaHS stimulates HIF-1α, resulting in VEGF activation and subsequently angiogenesis . Also, the treatment of EC 109 cells with 400 µm of NaHS promotes vascular formation by increasing the expression of VEGF and activating HSP 90 pathway . In brief, these data indicate that treatment with NaHS can promote cancer metastasis through the stimulation of angiogenesis which occurs via the stimulation of VEGF.
Cancer cells undergo several adjustments in energy supply mode so as to sustain the increased requirements. Cancer cells have been reported to undergo aerobic glycolysis in addition to the common mitochondria pathway in order to fulfill the high energy requirements . At lower H2S concentrations, most cells are reported to consume sulfide as a substrate in mitochondria sulfide-quinone reductase (SQR) of the mitochondria pathway, the event results in a reverse electron transfer in HT-29 colon cells . A recent study indicates that H2S signals by reprogramming energy metabolism which is in addition to the common pathway involving cysteine persulfidation . The study also demonstrates the dominant role of SQR in inhibiting the anti-proliferative properties of H2S at high levels. However, the involved mechanism is yet to be elucidated. Besides, it has been shown that the HIF-1α can positively mediate the functioning of glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1), an important element in glucose transportation . On the downstream, the activation of GLUT-1 promotes the Warburg effect and reduces apoptosis . With respect to H2S, the activation of HIF-1α mediated by NaHS treatment has been reported in NSCLC . Therefore, it is possible that NaHS treatment could result in the elevation of cellular bioenergetics by enhancing HIF-1α and GLUT-1-mediated aerobic glycolysis. It has also been shown that the treatment of HCT116 colon cancer cells with low concentrations of GYY4137 increases mitochondrial function and glycolysis by persulfidating the Cys-163 of the lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) resulting in its stimulation . The activation of LDHA could result in increased glycolysis and Warburg effect . In summary, the above evidences indicate that H2S donors can induce pro-proliferative effects by modulating cellular bioenergetics via the activations of HIF-1α and LDHA.
H2S donors have consistently been associated with the treatment of numerous cancer types and at different stages. These donors have shown great results in suppressing different cancer types by regulating the associated cellular activities and signaling pathways. However, the alarming inconsistency shown specifically in the case of NaHS (Table 1) needs to be further addressed. Currently, one of the explanations pinpointed is the short-time and high concentration-releasing nature of NaHS resulting in temporary elevation of cellular H2S levels followed by its subsequent decline which opposes the normal slow-releasing cellular mode and eliminate NaHS as a viable option in clinical settings. Furthermore, limited information on byproducts and clearance mechanism of these donors which raise many questions concerning their applicability. Therefore, it is important to determine the viable range of H2S donors' concentration and examine physiological factors such as toxicity and clearance mechanism. In addition, the effects imposed by the physical and chemical properties of these donors, their possible interactions need further investigation for better understanding of possible side effects. The combination of these donors with other cancer drugs such as docetaxel and cisplatin have presented improved drug sensitivity and reduced resistance [167, 168]. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of H2S donors with metformin/simvastatin have been shown to promote anti-cancer activities by elevating intracellular acidity and impairing pH regulators. The combination of H2S donors with metformin/simvastatin or other cancer drugs might be useful in the treatment of advanced stages of cancer, and with the available data, it is worth conducting more animal studies and clinical trials to test the hypothesis. The effects of sulfuration-dependent post-translation modifications of proteins also need to be further investigated, since elevating the levels of H2S increases the chance of sulfuration which might affect the primary functions of numerous proteins. In conclusion, H2S donors have shown great potential in cancer treatment individually and in combination with other drugs, with more researches still ongoing, it is possible that these donors could be a great addition to cancer therapy, however more work is needed to be done.
The summary of the effects of NaHS in different cancer cell types.
|Cancer types||Cell lines||NaHS doses||Effects on Cancer||References|
|Breast cancer||MCF-7||5-20 µM, 500 µM||Inhibition||[14, 112]|
|HCC||HepG2||5-20 µM, 1000 µM||Inhibition||[14, 38]|
|800 µM||Inhibition||[113, 128]|
|Esophageal carcinoma||EC 109||200-1000 µM||Promotion||[18, 175]|
|Glioma||C6||100-1600 µM||Promotion/Inhibition||[153, 179]|
|Gastric cancer||SGC 7901||200-800 µM||Inhibition|||
|200-1000 µM||Promotion||[172, 178]|
|Multiple Myeloma||NCI-H929||250-1000 µM||Promotion|||
|Bladder Cancer||EJ||400 µM||Promotion|||
|Colon Cancer||HCT 116|
|50 - 200 µM||Promotion||[173, 199]|
H2S: hydrogen sulfide; CBS: cystathionine beta-synthase; 3-MPST: 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase; CSE: cystathionine gamma-lyase; NaHS: sodium hydrosulfide; DAS: diallyl sulfide; DADS: diallyl disulfide; DATS: diallyl trisulfide; GYY4137: morpholin-4-ium-4-methoxyphenyl(morpholino) phosphinodithioate; ADT-OH: 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione; ATB-346: 2-(6-methoxynapthalen-2-yl)-propionic acid 4-thiocarbamoyl phenyl ester; ABCA1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; GLT-1: glutamine transporter-1; STAT-3: signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; NF-кB: nuclear factor-kappa B; Nrf-2: nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor-2; HO-1: heme oxygenase-1; Tregs: regulatory T cells; TGF-ꞵ: transforming growth factor-beta; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; ROS: reactive oxygen species; PARP: poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase; eIF2α: eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit alpha; Keap 1: Kelch-like ECH associated protein 1; CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase; MMPs: matrix metalloproteinases; MT2A: metallothionein 2A; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Bcl-2: B cell lymphoma 2; Bax: Bcl-2-associated X protein; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Wnt: wingless integrated; ꞵ-catenin: beta catenin; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; MAPK: mitogen activated protein kinase; cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; SQR: sulfide-quinone reductase; LDHA: lactate dehydrogenase A.
The authors thank Prof. Xin-Ying Ji, Prof. Shao-Feng Duan and Dr. Dong-Dong Wu for their guidance in finalizing the manuscript. Besides, we have countless thanks to the database of websites for their permission to use their data.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81802718, 81670088, U1504817), the Foundation of Science & Technology Department of Henan Province, China (Nos. 202102310480, 182102310335, 192102310151), the Training Program for Young Backbone Teachers of Institutions of Higher Learning in Henan Province, China (No. 2020GGJS038), and the Science Foundation for Young Talents of Henan University College of Medicine, China (No. 2019013).
DDW and XYJ conceived the concept of the review and supervised the project. EEN, AA, MS, SK, SUZ, NHK, TL, QYJ and XZ reviewed literatures and extracted data. EEN drafted the manuscript. DDW, SFD and XYJ revised the manuscript and provided intellectual input on the review. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424
2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:e359-86
3. Sharifi MN, Mowers EE, Drake LE. et al. Autophagy Promotes Focal Adhesion Disassembly and Cell Motility of Metastatic Tumor Cells through the Direct Interaction of Paxillin with LC3. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1660-72
4. Castilla C, Congregado B, Chinchón D. et al. Bcl-xL is overexpressed in hormone-resistant prostate cancer and promotes survival of LNCaP cells via interaction with proapoptotic Bak. Endocrinology. 2006;147:4960-7
5. Sun Y, Wang BE, Leong KG. et al. Androgen deprivation causes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the prostate: implications for androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:527-36
6. Abe K, Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. J Neurosci. 1996;16:1066-71
7. Kimura H. Production and physiological effects of hydrogen sulfide. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:783-93
8. Stipanuk MH, Beck PW. Characterization of the enzymic capacity for cysteine desulphhydration in liver and kidney of the rat. Biochem J. 1982;206:267-77
9. Shibuya N, Mikami Y, Kimura Y. et al. Vascular endothelium expresses 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase and produces hydrogen sulfide. J Biochem. 2009;146:623-6
10. Askari H, Seifi B, Kadkhodaee M. et al. Protective effects of hydrogen sulfide on chronic kidney disease by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. EXCLI J. 2018;17:14-23
11. John AMSP, Kundu S, Pushpakumar S. et al. GYY4137, a Hydrogen Sulfide Donor Modulates miR194-Dependent Collagen Realignment in Diabetic Kidney. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10924
12. Dong Q, Yang B, Han JG. et al. A novel hydrogen sulfide-releasing donor, HA-ADT, suppresses the growth of human breast cancer cells through inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 2019;455:60-72
13. Zhen Y, Wu Q, Ding Y. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth by activating the STAT3-COX-2 signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:6562-70
14. Lee ZW, Zhou J, Chen CS. et al. The slow-releasing hydrogen sulfide donor, GYY4137, exhibits novel anti-cancer effects in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21077
15. Sakuma S, Minamino S, Takase M. et al. Hydrogen sulfide donor GYY4137 suppresses proliferation of human colorectal cancer Caco-2 cells by inducing both cell cycle arrest and cell death. Heliyon. 2019;5:e02244
16. Oláh G, Módis K, Törö G. et al. Role of endogenous and exogenous nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide in HCT116 colon cancer cell proliferation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;149:186-204
17. You J, Ma M, Ye J. et al. Down-regulation of cystathionine- γ -lyase/H 2 S system inhibits cell growth in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. BIO Web of Conferences. 2017;8:01034
18. Lei Y, Zhen Y, Zhang W. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide exerts proliferation, anti-apoptosis, angiopoiesis and migration effects via activating HSP90 pathway in EC109 cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:3714-20
19. Powell CR, Dillon KM, Matson JB. A review of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) donors: Chemistry and potential therapeutic applications. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;149:110-23
20. Zhao Y, Biggs TD, Xian M. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) releasing agents: chemistry and biological applications. Chem Commun. 2014;50:11788-805
21. Szczesny B, Módis K, Yanagi K. et al. AP39, a novel mitochondria-targeted hydrogen sulfide donor, stimulates cellular bioenergetics, exerts cytoprotective effects and protects against the loss of mitochondrial DNA integrity in oxidatively stressed endothelial cells in vitro. Nitric Oxide. 2014;41:120-30
22. Drapala A, Koszelewski D, Tomasova L. et al. Parenteral Na (2) S, a fast-releasing H (2) S donor, but not GYY4137, a slow-releasing H (2)S donor, lowers blood pressure in rats. Acta Biochim Pol. 2017;64:561-6
23. De Preter G, Deriemaeker C, Danhier P. et al. A Fast Hydrogen Sulfide-Releasing Donor Increases the Tumor Response to Radiotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15:154-61
24. Sun X, Wang W, Dai J. et al. A Long-Term and Slow-Releasing Hydrogen Sulfide Donor Protects against Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3541
25. Liang D, Wu H, Wong MW. et al. Diallyl Trisulfide Is a Fast H2S Donor, but Diallyl Disulfide Is a Slow One: The Reaction Pathways and Intermediates of Glutathione with Polysulfides. Org Lett. 2015;17:4196-9
26. Lee ZW, Deng LW. Role of H2S Donors in Cancer Biology. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015;230:243-65
27. Yang CT, Chen L, Xu S. et al. Recent Development of Hydrogen Sulfide Releasing/Stimulating Reagents and Their Potential Applications in Cancer and Glycometabolic Disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:664
28. Reis AKCA, Stern A, Monteiro HP. S-nitrosothiols and H2S donors: Potential chemo-therapeutic agents in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019;27:101190
29. Song ZJ, Ng MY, Lee ZW. et al. Hydrogen sulfide donors in research and drug development. Med Chem Comm. 2014;5:557-70
30. d'Emmanuele di Villa Bianca R, Sorrentino R, Maffia P. et al. Hydrogen sulfide as a mediator of human corpus cavernosum smooth-muscle relaxation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:4513-8
31. Luo R, Hu S, Liu Q. et al. Hydrogen sulfide upregulates renal AQP-2 protein expression and promotes urine concentration. FASEB J. 2019;33:469-83
32. Feng C, Luo Y, Nian Y. et al. Diallyl Disulfide Suppresses the Inflammation and Apoptosis Resistance Induced by DCA Through ROS and the NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Human Barrett's Epithelial Cells. Inflammation. 2017;40:818-31
33. Zhang F, Jin H, Wu L. et al. Diallyl Trisulfide Suppresses Oxidative Stress-Induced Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells through Production of Hydrogen Sulfide. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:1406726
34. Kim J, Hong SJ, Park JH. et al. Expression of cystathionine beta-synthase is downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis. Oncol Rep. 2009;21:1449-54
35. Wang L, Cai H, Hu Y. et al. A pharmacological probe identifies cystathionine β-synthase as a new negative regulator for ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1005
36. You J, Shi X, Liang H. et al. Cystathionine- γ-lyase promotes process of breast cancer in association with STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:65677-86
37. Sekiguchi F, Sekimoto T, Ogura A. et al. Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Cell Proliferation of Human Gastric Cancer AGS Cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2016;39:887-90
38. Wang SS, Chen YH, Chen N. et al. Hydrogen sulfide promotes autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2688
39. Zhang L, Qi Q, Yang J. et al. An Anticancer Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Human Gastric Cancer Cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:636410
40. Li D, Xiong Q, Peng J. et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Up-Regulates the Expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter A1 via Promoting Nuclear Translocation of PPARα. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:635
41. Miyamoto R, Otsuguro KI, Ito S. Time- and concentration-dependent activation of TRPA1 by hydrogen sulfide in rat DRG neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2011;499:137-42
42. Dai L, Qian Y, Zhou J. et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhibited L-type calcium channels (CaV1.2) via up-regulation of the channel sulfhydration in vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;858:172455
43. Jacquemet G, Baghirov H, Georgiadou M. et al. L-type calcium channels regulate filopodia stability and cancer cell invasion downstream of integrin signalling. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13297
44. Takahashi N, Chen HY, Harris IS. et al. Cancer Cells Co-opt the Neuronal Redox-Sensing Channel TRPA1 to Promote Oxidative-Stress Tolerance. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:985-1003
45. Aguirre-Portolés C, Feliu J, Reglero G. et al. ABCA1 overexpression worsens colorectal cancer prognosis by facilitating tumour growth and caveolin-1-dependent invasiveness, and these effects can be ameliorated using the BET inhibitor apabetalone. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:1735-52
46. Elies J, Scragg JL, Huang S. et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhibits Cav3.2 T-type Ca2+ channels. FASEB J. 2014;28:5376-87
47. Huang W, Lu C, Wu Y. et al. T-type calcium channel antagonists, mibefradil and NNC-55-0396 inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in leukemia cell lines. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:54
48. Dziegielewska B, Casarez EV, Yang WZ. et al. T-Type Ca2+ Channel Inhibition Sensitizes Ovarian Cancer to Carboplatin. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15:460-70
49. Granados K, Hüser L, Federico A. et al. T-type calcium channel inhibition restores sensitivity to MAPK inhibitors in de-differentiated and adaptive melanoma cells. Br J Cancer. 2020;122:1023-36
50. Xiao L, Lan A, Mo L. et al. Hydrogen sulfide protects PC12 cells against reactive oxygen species and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2-mediated downregulation of glutamate transporter-1 expression induced by chemical hypoxia. Int J Mol Med. 2012;30:1126-32
51. Bachmeier BE, Iancu CM, Killian PH. et al. Overexpression of the ATP binding cassette gene ABCA1 determines resistance to Curcumin in M14 melanoma cells. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:129
52. Lidgren A, Bergh A, Grankvist K. et al. Glucose transporter-1 expression in renal cell carcinoma and its correlation with hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha. BJU Int. 2008;101:480-4
53. Vanhoutte N, Abarca-Quinones J, Jordan BF. et al. Enhanced expression of the high affinity glutamate transporter GLT-1 in C6 glioma cells delays tumour progression in rat. Exp Neurol. 2009;218:56-63
54. Wu D, Zhong P, Wang J. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide mitigates LPS + ATP-induced inflammation by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation and promoting autophagy in L02 cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2019;457:145-56
55. Lu S, Gao Y, Huang X. et al. GYY4137, a hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) donor, shows potent anti-hepatocellular carcinoma activity through blocking the STAT3 pathway. Int J Oncol. 2014;44:1259-67
56. Vasilieva SV, Petrishcheva MS, Yashkina EI. et al. Signaling and physiological activity of the NO-donating agent TNICthio in human blood lymphocytes, Jurkat and MCF7 cell lines. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46:719-25
57. Chen XX, Liu XW, Zhou ZG. et al. Diallyl disulfide inhibits invasion and metastasis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro by down-regulating p38 activity. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016;36:814-8
58. Carrington SJ, Chakraborty I, Bernard JM. et al. Synthesis and Characterization of a "Turn-On" photoCORM for Trackable CO Delivery to Biological Targets. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2014;5:1324-8
59. Saidu NEB, Abu Asali I, Czepukojc B. et al. Comparison between the effects of diallyl tetrasulfide on human retina pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19) and HCT116 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:5267-76
60. Gong P, Hu B, Cederbaum AI. Diallyl sulfide induces heme oxygenase-1 through MAPK pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;432:252-60
61. Xu XH, Li GL, Wang BA. et al. Diallyl trisufide protects against oxygen glucose deprivation -induced apoptosis by scavenging free radicals via the PI3K/Akt -mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in B35 neural cells. Brain Res. 2015;1614:38-50
62. Tenhunen R, Marver HS, Schmid R. Microsomal heme oxygenase. Characterization of the enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1969;244:6388-94
63. Kawahara B, Moller T, Hu-Moore K. et al. Attenuation of Antioxidant Capacity in Human Breast Cancer Cells by Carbon Monoxide through Inhibition of Cystathionine β-Synthase Activity: Implications in Chemotherapeutic Drug Sensitivity. J Med Chem. 2017;60:8000-10
64. Youness RA, Assal RA, Motaal AA. et al. A novel role of sONE/NOS3/NO signaling cascade in mediating hydrogen sulphide bilateral effects on triple negative breast cancer progression. Nitric Oxide. 2018;80:12-23
65. Ondrias K, Stasko A, Cacanyiova S. et al. H2S and HS- donor NaHS releases nitric oxide from nitrosothiols, metal nitrosyl complex, brain homogenate and murine L1210 leukaemia cells. Pflugers Arch. 2008;457:271-9
66. Gonzalez H, Hagerling C, Werb Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1267-84
67. Joshi NS, Akama-Garren EH, Lu Y. et al. Regulatory T Cells in Tumor-Associated Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Suppress Anti-tumor T Cell Responses. Immunity. 2015;43:579-90
68. Huang AH, Wang HB, Wu ZF. et al. Infiltrating regulatory T cells promote invasiveness of liver cancer cells via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Transl Cancer Res. 2019;8:2405-15
69. Chen ML, Pittet MJ, Gorelik L. et al. Regulatory T cells suppress tumor-specific CD8 T cell cytotoxicity through TGF-β signals in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:419-24
70. Hiraoka N, Onozato K, Kosuge T. et al. Prevalence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5423-34
71. Kobayashi N, Hiraoka N, Yamagami W. et al. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells affect the development and progression of hepatocarcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:902-11
72. Cakouros D, Hemming S, Gronthos K. et al. Specific functions of TET1 and TET2 in regulating mesenchymal cell lineage determination. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2019;12:3
73. Yue X, Lio CWJ, Samaniego-Castruita D. et al. Loss of TET2 and TET3 in regulatory T cells unleashes effector function. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2011
74. Xu YP, Lv L, Liu Y. et al. Tumor suppressor TET2 promotes cancer immunity and immunotherapy efficacy. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:4316-31
75. Hsu CH, Peng KL, Kang ML. et al. TET1 suppresses cancer invasion by activating the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Cell Rep. 2012;2:568-79
76. Yang L, Yu SJ, Hong Q. et al. Reduced Expression of TET1, TET2, TET3 and TDG mRNAs Are Associated with Poor Prognosis of Patients with Early Breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133896
77. Guo H, Zhu H, Zhang J. et al. TET1 suppresses colon cancer proliferation by impairing β-catenin signal pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:12559-65
78. Yang R, Qu C, Zhou Y. et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Promotes Tet1- and Tet2-Mediated Foxp3 Demethylation to Drive Regulatory T Cell Differentiation and Maintain Immune Homeostasis. Immunity. 2015;43:251-63
79. Chen LY, Huang RL, Chan MW. et al. TET1 reprograms the epithelial ovarian cancer epigenome and reveals casein kinase 2α as a therapeutic target. J Pathol. 2019;248:363-76
80. Habib S, Moinuddin, Ali A. et al. Preferential recognition of peroxynitrite modified human DNA by circulating autoantibodies in cancer patients. Cell Immunol. 2009;254:117-23
81. Filipovic MR, Miljkovic J, Allgäuer A. et al. Biochemical insight into physiological effects of H2S: reaction with peroxynitrite and formation of a new nitric oxide donor, sulfinyl nitrite. Biochem J. 2012;441:609-21
82. Zhang Z, Fang X, Yang X. et al. Hydrogen sulfide donor NaHS alters antibody structure and function via sulfhydration. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;73:491-501
83. Baatrup G, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Qvist N. Perioperative functional activity of the alternative pathway of complement in patients with colonic cancer. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:962-5
84. Kraut EH, Sagone AL Jr. Alternative pathway of complement in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 1981;11:335-45
85. Poveda AM, Clech ML, Pasero P. Transcription and replication: breaking the rules of the road causes genomic instability. Transcription. 2010;1:99-102
86. Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473:337-42
87. Ochnik AM, Peterson MS, Avdulov SV. et al. Amplified in Breast Cancer Regulates Transcription and Translation in Breast Cancer Cells. Neoplasia. 2016;18:100-10
88. Lin S, Choe J, Du P. et al. The m6A Methyltransferase METTL3 Promotes Translation in Human Cancer Cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62:335-45
89. Ho CY, Cheng YT, Chau CF. et al. Effect of Diallyl Sulfide on in Vitro and in Vivo Nrf2-Mediated Pulmonic Antioxidant Enzyme Expression via Activation ERK/p38 Signaling Pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:100-7
90. Liu Y, Deng Y, Liu H. et al. Hydrogen sulfide ameliorates learning memory impairment in APP/PS1 transgenic mice: A novel mechanism mediated by the activation of Nrf2. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016;150-151:207-16
91. Lohninger L, Tomasova L, Praschberger M. et al. Hydrogen sulphide induces HIF-1α and Nrf2 in THP-1 macrophages. Biochimie. 2015;112:187-95
92. Meng G, Xiao Y, Ma Y. et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Regulates Krüppel-Like Factor 5 Transcription Activity via Specificity Protein 1 S-Sulfhydration at Cys664 to Prevent Myocardial Hypertrophy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004160
93. Li Q, Dong Z, Zhou F. et al. Krüppel-Like Factor 5 Promotes Lung Tumorigenesis through Upregulation of Sox4. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33:1-10
94. Ma Y, Wang Q, Liu F. et al. KLF5 promotes the tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of thyroid cancer cells through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2018;40:2608-18
95. Paul BD, Snyder SH. Protein sulfhydration. Methods Enzymol. 2015;555:79-90
96. Yadav V, Gao XH, Willard B. et al. Hydrogen sulfide modulates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) phosphorylation status in the integrated stress-response pathway. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:13143-53
97. Harvey RF, Pöyry TAA, Stoneley M. et al. Signaling from mTOR to eIF2α mediates cell migration in response to the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin. Sci Signal. 2019;12:eaaw6763
98. Du J, Huang Y, Yan H. et al. Hydrogen sulfide suppresses oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL)-stimulated monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 generation from macrophages via the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:9741-53
99. Sen N, Paul BD, Gadalla MM. et al. Hydrogen sulfide-linked sulfhydration of NF-κB mediates its antiapoptotic actions. Mol Cell. 2012;45:13-24
100. Yang G, Zhao K, Ju Y. et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Protects Against Cellular Senescence via S-Sulfhydration of Keap1 and Activation of Nrf2. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18:1906-19
101. Zhao S, Song T, Gu Y. et al. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates liver injury via S-sulfhydrated-Keap1/Nrf-2/LRP1 pathway. Hepatology. 2020 [Epub ahead of print]
102. Kim S, Lee HG, Park SA. et al. Keap1 cysteine 288 as a potential target for diallyl trisulfide-induced Nrf-2 activation. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85984
103. Hourihan JM, Kenna JG, Hayes JD. The gasotransmitter hydrogen sulfide induces nrf2-target genes by inactivating the keap1 ubiquitin ligase substrate adaptor through formation of a disulfide bond between cys-226 and cys-613. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:465-81
104. Li Y, Kong R, Chen H. et al. Overexpression of KLF5 is associated with poor survival and G1/S progression in pancreatic cancer. Aging. 2019;11:5035-57
105. Wang H, Chen Y, Chen J. et al. Cell Cycle Regulation of DNA Polymerase Beta in Rotenone-Based Parkinson's Disease Models. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109697
106. Koryakina Y, Knudsen KE, Gioeli D. Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of androgen receptor function. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:249-64
107. Pucci B, Kasten M, Giordano A. Cell cycle and apoptosis. Neoplasia. 2000;2:291-9
108. Barbash O, Diehl JA. Regulation of the cell cycle. The molecular basis of cancer, 3rd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 2008:177-188
109. Casem ML. Cell Cycle. Case Studies in Cell Biology. 2016:299-326
110. Erdmann K, Kaulke K, Rieger C. et al. MiR-26a and miR-138 block the G1/S transition by targeting the cell cycle regulating network in prostate cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:2249-61
111. Reddy HKDL, Mettus RV, Rane SG. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 expression is essential for neu-induced breast tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10174-8
112. Lv M, Li Y, Ji MH. et al. Inhibition of invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human breast cancer cells by hydrogen sulfide through decreased phospho-p38 expression. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10:341-6
113. Ma Y, Yan Z, Deng X. et al. Anticancer effect of exogenous hydrogen sulfide in cisplatin-resistant A549/DDP cells. Oncol Rep. 2018;39:2969-77
114. Zheng J, Cheng X, Xu S. et al. Diallyl trisulfide induces G2/M cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma 8505C cells. Food Funct. 2019;10:7253-61
115. Shin SS, Song JH, Hwang B. et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 4 potentiates DATS-induced inhibition of proliferation, migration, and invasion of bladder cancer EJ cells; involvement of G(2)/M-phase cell cycle arrest, signaling pathways, and transcription factors-mediated MMP-9 expression. Food Nutr Res. 2017;61:1338918
116. Herman-Antosiewicz A, Kim YA, Kim SH. et al. Diallyl trisulfide-induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest in DU145 cells is associated with delayed nuclear translocation of cyclin-dependent kinase 1. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1072-9
117. Choi YH. Diallyl trisulfide induces apoptosis and mitotic arrest in AGS human gastric carcinoma cells through reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;94:63-71
118. Jiang XY, Zhu XS, Xu HY. et al. Diallyl trisulfide suppresses tumor growth through the attenuation of Nrf2/Akt and activation of p38/JNK and potentiates cisplatin efficacy in gastric cancer treatment. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:1048-58
119. Wang H, Sun N, Li X. et al. Diallyl trisulfide induces osteosarcoma cell apoptosis through reactive oxygen species-mediated downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:3648-58
120. Saini V, Manral A, Arora R. et al. Novel synthetic analogs of diallyl disulfide triggers cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via ROS generation in MIA PaCa-2 cells. Pharmacol Rep. 2017;69:813-21
121. Zhang RT, Shi HR, Ren F. et al. Effects of Diallyl Disulfide on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells by Inducing G2/M Arrest. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2019;41:43-52
122. Song JD, Lee SK, Kim KM. et al. Molecular mechanism of diallyl disulfide in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HCT-116 colon cancer cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2009;23:71-9
123. Tao Q, Wu C, Xu R. et al. Diallyl trisulfide inhibits proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis of glioma cells by inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;370:379-90
124. Geho DH, Bandle RW, Clair T. et al. Physiological Mechanisms of Tumor-Cell Invasion and Migration. Physiology. 2005;20:194-200
125. Ilina O, Friedl P. Mechanisms of collective cell migration at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:3203-8
126. Wu D, Li M, Tian W. et al. Hydrogen sulfide acts as a double-edged sword in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells through EGFR/ERK/MMP-2 and PTEN/AKT signaling pathways. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5134
127. Wu D, Li J, Zhang Q. et al. Exogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Regulates the Growth of Human Thyroid Carcinoma Cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:6927298
128. Ye M, Yu M, Yang D. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide donor NaHS alleviates nickel-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the migration of A549 cells by regulating TGF-β1/Smad2/Smad3 signaling. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;195:110464
129. Lai KC, Hsu SC, Kuo CL. et al. Diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide, and diallyl trisulfide inhibit migration and invasion in human colon cancer colo 205 cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2, -7, and -9 expressions. Environ Toxicol. 2013;28:479-88
130. Lai KC, Hsu SC, Yang JS. et al. Diallyl trisulfide inhibits migration, invasion and angiogenesis of human colon cancer HT-29 cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells, and suppresses murine xenograft tumour growth. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19:474-84
131. Xie X, Huang X, Tang H. et al. Diallyl Disulfide Inhibits Breast Cancer Stem Cell Progression and Glucose Metabolism by Targeting CD44/PKM2/AMPK Signaling. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2018;18:592-9
132. Xia L, Lin J, Su J. et al. Diallyl disulfide inhibits colon cancer metastasis by suppressing Rac1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:5713-28
133. Su B, Su J, Zeng Y. et al. Diallyl disulfide suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion and proliferation by downregulation of LIMK1 in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:10498-512
134. Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Pathol. 2010;221:3-12
135. Vera-Ramirez L, Vodnala SK, Nini R. et al. Autophagy promotes the survival of dormant breast cancer cells and metastatic tumour recurrence. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1944
136. Zhao R, Bei X, Yang B. et al. Endothelial cells promote metastasis of prostate cancer by enhancing autophagy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:221
137. Qureshi-Baig K, Kuhn D, Viry E. et al. Hypoxia-induced autophagy drives colorectal cancer initiation and progression by activating the PRKC/PKC-EZR (ezrin) pathway. Autophagy. 2020;16:1436-52
138. Geng X, Zhang X, Zhou B. et al. Usnic Acid Induces Cycle Arrest, Apoptosis, and Autophagy in Gastric Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:556-66
139. Wu J, Hu G, Dong Y. et al. Matrine induces Akt/mTOR signalling inhibition-mediated autophagy and apoptosis in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:1171-81
140. Yun CW, Lee SH. The Roles of Autophagy in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3466
141. Deretic V. Autophagosome and phagosome. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;445:1-10
142. Yue Z, Guan X, Chao R. et al. Diallyl Disulfide Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy in Human Osteosarcoma MG-63 Cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway. Molecules. 2019;24:2665
143. Suangtamai T, Tanyong DI. Diallyl disulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy via mTOR pathway in myeloid leukemic cell line. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:10993-9
144. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495-516
145. Zimmermann KC, Green DR. How cells die: apoptosis pathways. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:S99-103
146. Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Mechanisms of granule-dependent killing. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:251-62
147. Carthy CM, Granville DJ, Watson KA. et al. Caspase Activation and Specific Cleavage of Substrates after Coxsackievirus B3-Induced Cytopathic Effect in HeLa Cells. J Virol. 1998;72:7669-75
148. Parrish AB, Freel CD, Kornbluth S. Cellular mechanisms controlling caspase activation and function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a008672
149. Kang JH, Jang YS, Lee HJ. et al. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling induces apoptosis and suppresses growth of lung cancer: good and bad. Lab Anim Res. 2019;35:30
150. Szadvari I, Hudecova S, Chovancova B. et al. Sodium/calcium exchanger is involved in apoptosis induced by H2S in tumor cells through decreased levels of intracellular pH. Nitric Oxide. 2019;87:1-9
151. Sahu RP, Srivastava SK. The role of STAT-3 in the induction of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by benzyl isothiocyanate. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:176-93
152. Xie L, Zeng Y, Dai Z. et al. Chemical and genetic inhibition of STAT3 sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib induced cell death. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14:577-85
153. Zhao L, Wang Y, Yan Q. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide exhibits anti-cancer effects though p38 MAPK signaling pathway in C6 glioma cells. Biol Chem. 2015;396:1247-53
154. De Cicco P, Panza E, Ercolano G. et al. ATB-346, a novel hydrogen sulfide-releasing anti-inflammatory drug, induces apoptosis of human melanoma cells and inhibits melanoma development in vivo. Pharmacol Res. 2016;114:67-73
155. Cai F, Xu H, Cao N. et al. ADT-OH, a hydrogen sulfide-releasing donor, induces apoptosis and inhibits the development of melanoma in vivo by upregulating FADD. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:33
156. Pan J, Zhang L, Xu S. et al. Induction of Apoptosis in Human Papillary-Thyroid-Carcinoma BCPAP Cells by Diallyl Trisulfide through Activation of the MAPK Signaling Pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66:5871-8
157. Shigemi Z, Furukawa Y, Hosokawa K. et al. Diallyl trisulfide induces apoptosis by suppressing NF-κB signaling through destabilization of TRAF6 in primary effusion lymphoma. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:293-304
158. Griffiths JR. Are cancer cells acidic?. Br J Cancer. 1991;64:425-7
159. Mookerjee SA, Goncalves RLS, Gerencser AA. et al. The contributions of respiration and glycolysis to extracellular acid production. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1847:171-81
160. White KA, Grillo-Hill BK, Barber DL. Cancer cell behaviors mediated by dysregulated pH dynamics at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2017;130:663-9
161. Damaghi M, Wojtkowiak JW, Gillies RJ. pH Sensing and Regulation in Cancer. Front Physiol. 2013;4:370
162. Furlong IJ, Ascaso R, Lopez Rivas A. et al. Intracellular acidification induces apoptosis by stimulating ICE-like protease activity. J Cell Sci. 1997;110:653-61
163. Liao LX, Tsai CY, Atan MSBM. et al. P28 Identification of a novel slow-releasing hydrogen sulfide donor for cancer therapy. Nitric Oxide. 2013;31:S47
164. Lee ZW, Teo XY, Song ZJ. et al. Intracellular Hyper-Acidification Potentiated by Hydrogen Sulfide Mediates Invasive and Therapy Resistant Cancer Cell Death. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:763
165. Karjalainen E, Repasky GA. Molecular Changes During Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Evolution and Identification of Novel Treatment Strategies Through Molecular Stratification. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2016;144:383-436
166. Pan Y, Lin S, Xing R. et al. Epigenetic Upregulation of Metallothionein 2A by Diallyl Trisulfide Enhances Chemosensitivity of Human Gastric Cancer Cells to Docetaxel Through Attenuating NF-κB Activation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2016;24:839-54
167. Pan Y, Huang J, Xing R. et al. Metallothionein 2A inhibits NF-κB pathway activation and predicts clinical outcome segregated with TNM stage in gastric cancer patients following radical resection. J Transl Med. 2013;11:173
168. Wang Z, Xia Q, Cui J. et al. Reversion of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance by diallyl trisulfide in a human osteosarcoma cell line. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:2720-6
169. Fouad AA, Hafez HM, Hamouda A. Hydrogen sulfide modulates IL-6/STAT3 pathway and inhibits oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis in rat model of methotrexate hepatotoxicity. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2020;39:77-85
170. Caysa H, Hoffmann S, Luetzkendorf J. et al. Monitoring of xenograft tumor growth and response to chemotherapy by non-invasive in vivo multispectral fluorescence imaging. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47927
171. Chandra-Kuntal K, Singh SV. Diallyl trisulfide inhibits activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in prostate cancer cells in culture and in vivo. Cancer Prev Res. 2010;3:1473-83
172. Ma Z, Bi Q, Wang Y. Hydrogen sulfide accelerates cell cycle progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Oral Dis. 2015;21:156-62
173. Cai WJ, Wang MJ, Ju LH. et al. Hydrogen sulfide induces human colon cancer cell proliferation: role of Akt, ERK and p21. Cell Biol Int. 2010;34:565-72
174. Zheng D, Chen Z, Chen J. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide exerts proliferation, anti-apoptosis, migration effects and accelerates cell cycle progression in multiple myeloma cells via activating the Akt pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:1909-16
175. Lei YY, Feng YF, Zeng B. et al. Exogenous H (2) S promotes cancer progression by activating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in esophageal EC109 cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:3247-56
176. Zhen Y, Pan W, Hu F. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide exerts proliferation/anti-apoptosis/angiogenesis/migration effects via amplifying the activation of NF-κB pathway in PLC/PRF/5 hepatoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:2194-204
177. Pan Y, Ye S, Yuan D. et al. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)/cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) pathway contributes to the proliferation of hepatoma cells. Mutat Res. 2014;763-764:10-8
178. Zhang S, Bian H, Li X. et al. Hydrogen sulfide promotes cell proliferation of oral cancer through activation of the COX2/AKT/ERK1/2 axis. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:2825-32
179. Zhen Y, Zhang W, Liu C. et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide promotes C6 glioma cell growth through activation of the p38 MAPK/ERK1/2-COX-2 pathways. Oncol Rep. 2015;34:2413-22
180. DeLeon ER, Stoy GF, Olson KR. Passive loss of hydrogen sulfide in biological experiments. Anal Biochem. 2012;421:203-7
181. Huth HW, Santos DM, Gravina HD. et al. Upregulation of p38 pathway accelerates proliferation and migration of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:2497-505
182. Brown L, Benchimol S. The involvement of MAPK signaling pathways in determining the cellular response to p53 activation: cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:3832-40
183. Tomás-Loba A, Manieri E, González-Terán B. et al. p38γ is essential for cell cycle progression and liver tumorigenesis. Nature. 2019;568:557-60
184. Papapetropoulos A, Pyriochou A, Altaany Z. et al. Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous stimulator of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:21972-7
185. Potenza DM, Guerra G, Avanzato D. et al. Hydrogen sulphide triggers VEGF-induced intracellular Ca²⁺ signals in human endothelial cells but not in their immature progenitors. Cell Calcium. 2014;56:225-34
186. Coletta C, Papapetropoulos A, Erdelyi K. et al. Hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide are mutually dependent in the regulation of angiogenesis and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:9161-6
187. Pupo E, Pla AF, Avanzato D. et al. Hydrogen sulfide promotes calcium signals and migration in tumor-derived endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51:1765-73
188. Liu H, Chang J, Zhao Z. et al. Effects of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on the proliferation and invasion of human Bladder cancer cells. J Can Res Ther. 2017;13:829-32
189. Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang ZM. et al. Type-2 pericytes participate in normal and tumoral angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014;307:C25-38
190. Zhou Y, Li XH, Zhang CC. et al. Hydrogen sulfide promotes angiogenesis by downregulating miR-640 via the VEGFR2/mTOR pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2016;310:C305-17
191. Wang M, Yan J, Cao X. et al. Hydrogen sulfide modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer via HIF-1α activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;172:113775
192. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:325-37
193. Lagoutte E, Mimoun S, Andriamihaja M. et al. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide remains a priority in mammalian cells and causes reverse electron transfer in colonocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797:1500-11
194. Libiad M, Vitvitsky V, Bostelaar T. et al. Hydrogen sulfide perturbs mitochondrial bioenergetics and triggers metabolic reprogramming in colon cells. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:12077-90
195. Ebert BL, Firth JD, Ratcliffe PJ. Hypoxia and mitochondrial inhibitors regulate expression of glucose transporter-1 via distinct Cis-acting sequences. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:29083-9
196. Zhang TB, Zhao Y, Tong ZX. et al. Inhibition of glucose-transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression reversed Warburg effect in gastric cancer cell MKN45. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:2423-8
197. Untereiner AA, Oláh G, Módis K. et al. H (2) S-induced S-sulfhydration of lactate dehydrogenase a (LDHA) stimulates cellular bioenergetics in HCT116 colon cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;136:86-98
198. Li J, Zhu S, Tong J. et al. Suppression of lactate dehydrogenase A compromises tumor progression by downregulation of the Warburg effect in glioblastoma. Neuroreport. 2016;27:110-5
199. Hong M, Tang X, He, K. Effect of hydrogen sulfide on human colon cancer SW480 cell proliferation and migration in vitro. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014;34:699-703
Corresponding authors: ddwubiomed2010com (D.-D. W.); dsf_2007com (S.-F. D.); 10190096henu.edu.cn (X.-Y. J.); +86 371 23880525 (D.-D. W.), +86 371 23880680 (S.-F. D.), +86 371 23880585 (X.-Y. J.).